Two novel risk factors for postoperative venous thromboembolism: A reconsideration of standard risk assessment and prophylaxis

被引:3
作者
Vaughn, Stephanie C. [1 ]
Talutis, Stephanie D. [2 ]
Cassidy, Michael R. [2 ]
Sachs, Teviah E. [2 ]
Drake, Frederick T. [2 ]
Rosenkranz, Pamela [2 ]
Rao, Sowmya R. [3 ]
McAneny, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Venous thromboembolism; Enhanced prophylaxis; Risk stratification br; DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS; HOSPITALIZATION; PREVENTION; ENOXAPARIN; INFECTION; SURGERY; FAILURE; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.068
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is usually preventable with adequate prophylaxis. In an institutional study, patients with emergency operations (EO), multiple operations (MO), and perioperative sepsis (PS) were more likely to develop VTE despite standard prophylaxis. Methods: General surgery patients in the NSQIP database from 2011 to 2014 were stratified into VTE and non-VTE groups, and statistical analyses were performed. Results: Among 1,610,086 patients, 13,673 (0.8%) were diagnosed with VTE. The VTE odds ratios for patients with EO, MO and PS were 1.4 (95%CI:1.3-1.5), 1.9 (95%CI:1.7-2.0), and 2.4 (95%CI:2.2-2.5), respectively. VTE odds ratios increased with concurrence of two factors (EO+PS: 2.0 (95%CI:1.9-2.2)) (EO+MO: 2.3 (95%CI:1.9-2.7)) (MO+PS: 2.5 (95%CI:2.2-2.7)) and further still for patients with all three factors (2.7, 95%CI:2.4-3.0). Conclusion: General surgery patients with EO, MO, or PS have a greater likelihood of developing post-operative VTE. These factors are not necessarily captured in contemporary risk assessment models that guide chemoprophylaxis, and so these high-risk patients may receive insufficient prophylaxis. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1338 / 1343
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Thromboprophylaxis rates in US medical centers: success or failure? [J].
Amin, A. ;
Stemkowski, S. ;
Lin, J. ;
Yang, G. .
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2007, 5 (08) :1610-1616
[2]   Are hospitals delivering appropriate VTE prevention? The venous thromboembolism study to assess the rate of thromboprophylaxis (VTE start) [J].
Amin, A. ;
Spyropoulos, A. C. ;
Dobesh, P. ;
Shorr, A. ;
Hussein, M. ;
Mozaffari, E. ;
Benner, J. S. .
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2010, 29 (03) :326-339
[3]  
Amin Alpesh N, 2009, J Hosp Med, V4, pE15, DOI 10.1002/jhm.526
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, User Guide for the 2015 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File (PUF)]
[5]  
ARCELUS JI, 1991, SEMIN THROMB HEMOST, V17, P313
[6]   The Role of Inflammation in Venous Thromboembolism [J].
Branchford, Brian R. ;
Carpenter, Shannon L. .
FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2018, 6
[7]  
CAPRINI JA, 1991, SEMIN THROMB HEMOST, V17, P304
[8]   Patterns of Failure of a Standardized Perioperative Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Protocol [J].
Cassidy, Michael R. ;
Macht, Ryan D. ;
Rosenkranz, Pamela ;
Caprini, Joseph A. ;
McAneny, David .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2016, 222 (06) :1074-1080
[9]   Reducing Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism Complications with a Standardized Risk-Stratified Prophylaxis Protocol and Mobilization Program [J].
Cassidy, Michael R. ;
Rosenkranz, Pamela ;
McAneny, David .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 218 (06) :1095-1104
[10]   Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study [J].
Cohen, Alexander T. ;
Tapson, Victor F. ;
Bergmann, Jean-Francois ;
Goldhaber, Samuel Z. ;
Kakkar, Ajay K. ;
Deslandes, Bruno ;
Huang, Wei ;
Zayaruzny, Maksim ;
Emery, Leigh ;
Anderson, Frederick A., Jr. .
LANCET, 2008, 371 (9610) :387-394