Data warehousing process maturity: An exploratory study of factors influencing user perceptions

被引:25
作者
Sen, Arun [1 ]
Sinha, Atish P.
Ramamurthy, K.
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Informat & Operat Management, Mays Sch Business, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sheldon B Lubar Sch Business, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
关键词
capability maturity model; data warehouse; data warehousing process maturity; software development process; software engineering; workflow;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2006.877460
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the factors influencing perceptions of data warehousing process maturity. Data warehousing, like software development, is a process, which can be expressed in terms of components such as artifacts and workflows. In software engineering, the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) was developed to define different levels of software process maturity. We draw upon the concepts underlying CMM to define different maturity levels for a data warehousing process (DWP). Based on the literature in software development and maturity, we identify a set of features for characterizing the levels of data warehousing process maturity and conduct an exploratory field study to empirically examine if those indeed are factors influencing perceptions of maturity. Our focus in this paper is on managerial perceptions of DWP. The results of this exploratory study indicate that several factors-data quality, alignment of architecture, change management, organizational readiness, and data warehouse size-have an impact on DWP maturity, as perceived by IT professionals. From a practical standpoint, the results provide useful pointers, both managerial and technological, to organizations aspiring to elevate their data warehousing processes to more mature levels. This paper also opens up several areas for future research, including instrument development for assessing DWP maturity.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 455
页数:16
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
AGOSTA L, 2003, DM REV
[2]   Management issues in data warehousing: insights from the Housing and Development Board [J].
Ang, J ;
Teo, TSH .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2000, 29 (01) :11-20
[3]  
[Anonymous], MIS Q EXECUTIVE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, CMUSEI93TR024
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, DATA WAREHOUSE LIFEC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1990, MANAGING SOFTWARE PR
[7]   TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING - THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING [J].
ATTEWELL, P .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1992, 3 (01) :1-19
[8]  
BERSOFF EH, 1991, COMMUN ACM, V34, P104, DOI 10.1145/108515.108537
[9]  
Bourgeois L.J., 1980, Academy of Management Review, V5, P25, DOI [DOI 10.2307/257802, 10.5465/amr.1980.4288844, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1980.4288844]
[10]  
BOURGEOIS LJ, 1985, ACAD MANAGE J, V28, P548, DOI 10.5465/256113