Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies

被引:398
作者
Siegrist, Michael [1 ]
Hartmann, Christina [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis IED, Consumer Behav, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
NATURE FOOD | 2020年 / 1卷 / 06期
关键词
GENETICALLY-MODIFIED FOOD; PERCEIVED NATURALNESS; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; CULTURED MEAT; ORIENTING DISPOSITIONS; GENE TECHNOLOGY; NEOPHOBIA SCALE; RISK; DISGUST; TRUST;
D O I
10.1038/s43016-020-0094-x
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Novel food technologies are important for food security, safety and sustainability. Consumers, however, are often hesitant to accept them. In this narrative Review, we organize the research describing how heuristics and individual differences among consumers influence the acceptance of agri-food technologies. Associations evoked by a food technology, its perceived naturalness and trust in the industry using it influence consumer acceptance. Food neophobia, disgust sensitivity and cultural values are crucial personality factors for explaining individual differences. Using gene technology, nanotechnology, cultured meat and food irradiation as cases, we explore factors that may explain consumers' acceptance or lack of acceptance. Climate change, food supply shocks caused by crises such as pandemics and population growth are imminent threats to the food system. Therefore, disruptive food technologies will be needed to progress towards a more resilient food system. Taking into account the factors influencing consumers' perceptions of novel food technologies during the early stage of development and introduction will hopefully result in a higher acceptance of such technologies. Consumer acceptance of novel and disruptive technologies is key to their implementation and to building capacity for transforming food systems. Using gene technology, nanotechnology, cultured meat and food irradiation as cases, this Review explores consumer acceptance through the frames of food neophobia, disgust sensitivity and cultural values.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 350
页数:8
相关论文
共 117 条
  • [1] How would Swiss consumers decide if they had freedom of choice? Evidence from a field study with organic, conventional and GM corn bread
    Aerni, Philipp
    Scholderer, Joachim
    Ermen, David
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2011, 36 (06) : 830 - 838
  • [2] An empirical test of competing theories of hazard-related trust: The case of GM food
    Allum, Nick
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2007, 27 (04) : 935 - 946
  • [3] The influence of disgust sensitivity on self-reported food hygiene behaviour
    Ammann, Jeanine
    Siegrist, Michael
    Hartmann, Christina
    [J]. FOOD CONTROL, 2019, 102 : 131 - 138
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, Special Eurobarometer 469: Summary
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning
  • [6] Attitude towards resveratrol as a healthy botanical ingredient: The role of naturalness of product and message
    Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica
    Grunert, Klaus G.
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2017, 57 : 126 - 135
  • [7] "As long as it is not irradiated" - Influencing factors of US consumers' acceptance of food irradiation
    Bearth, Angela
    Siegrist, Michael
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2019, 71 : 141 - 148
  • [8] Brazilian consumer views on food irradiation
    Behrens, Jorge H.
    Barcellos, Maria N.
    Frewer, Lynn J.
    Nunes, Tatiana P.
    Landgraf, Mariza
    [J]. INNOVATIVE FOOD SCIENCE & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, 10 (03) : 383 - 389
  • [9] Restoring drinking water acceptance following a waterborne disease outbreak: the role of trust, risk perception, and communication
    Bratanova, Boyka
    Morrison, Greg
    Fife-Schaw, Chris
    Chenoweth, Jonathan
    Mangold, Mikael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 43 (09) : 1761 - 1770
  • [10] Consumers' attitudes and change of attitude toward 3D-printed food
    Brunner, Thomas A.
    Delley, Mathilde
    Denkel, Christoph
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2018, 68 : 389 - 396