Effects of Construal Level on Omission Detection and Multiattribute Evaluation

被引:22
作者
Pfeiffer, Bruce E. [1 ]
Deval, Helene [2 ]
Kardes, Frank R. [3 ]
Ewing, Douglas R. [4 ]
Han, Xiaoqi [5 ]
Cronley, Maria L. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Halifax, NS B3H 3J5, Canada
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[4] Bowling Green State Univ, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA
[5] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK USA
[6] Miami Univ, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
关键词
PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE; CONTEXTUAL INFLUENCES; TEMPORAL DISTANCE; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; INFORMATION; JUDGMENT; QUALITY; FOREST; TIME; SELF;
D O I
10.1002/mar.20748
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research has demonstrated that consumers are commonly insensitive to missing information and that this insensitivity can lead them to form strong beliefs and evaluations on the basis of weak evidence. A growing body of research has shown that sensitivity to omissions can be heightened and that this increased sensitivity results in more appropriate evaluations. Expanding on this, the current research finds that the level of abstraction by which a situation is construed can influence the likelihood of omission detection and the resulting evaluative judgments. A series of studies reveal that people are more likely to spontaneously detect omissions in near vs. distant judgments, in concrete vs. abstract mindsets, and when they are inherently more likely to interpret actions in concrete vs. abstract terms. Further, although prior findings suggest that people may have differential sensitivity to primary and secondary missing features at different levels of construal, the current research finds no such difference. The results of this study indicate that people are more sensitive to all types of missing information when construal levels are low, and that this sensitivity leads to more moderate and appropriate judgments.
引用
收藏
页码:992 / 1007
页数:16
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Anderson N. H., 1981, Foundations of Information Integration Theory
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Stumbling on Happiness
[5]   Long ago it was meant to be: The interplay between time, construal, and fate beliefs [J].
Burrus, Jeremy ;
Roese, Neal J. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2006, 32 (08) :1050-1058
[6]   What you don't know: The role played by errors of omission in imperfect self-assessments [J].
Caputo, D ;
Dunning, D .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 41 (05) :488-505
[7]  
Cohen J., 1983, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, DOI 10.4324/9780203774441
[8]   A selective hypothesis testing perspective on price-quality inference and inference-based choice [J].
Cronley, ML ;
Posavac, SS ;
Meyer, T ;
Kardes, FR ;
Kellaris, JJ .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 15 (02) :159-169
[9]   Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking:: Consequences for insight and creative cognition [J].
Förster, J ;
Friedman, RS ;
Liberman, N .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 87 (02) :177-189
[10]   RETRACTED: Why Love Has Wings and Sex Has Not: How Reminders of Love and Sex Influence Creative and Analytic Thinking (Retracted article. See vol. 42, pg. 1445, 2016) [J].
Forster, Jens ;
Epstude, Kai ;
Ozelsel, Amina .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2009, 35 (11) :1479-1491