Valuing the option to prototype: A case study with Generation Integrated Energy Storage

被引:9
作者
Lai, Chun Sing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Locatelli, Giorgio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Sch Civil Engn, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Automat, Dept Elect Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[3] Brunel Univ London, Brunel Inst Power Syst, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Prototyping; Real options analysis; Generation integrated energy storage; Energy infrastructure; Investment risk; REAL-OPTIONS; CARBON CAPTURE; HEAT-STORAGE; MOLTEN-SALT; POWER; INVESTMENT; SYSTEM; UNCERTAINTY; DESIGN; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2020.119290
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
New energy generation and storage systems are continuously being developed due to climate change, resource scarcity, and environmental laws. Some systems are incremental innovations of existing systems while others are radical innovations. Radical innovation systems are risky investments due to their relevant technical and economic uncertainties. Prototyping can hedge these risks by spending a fraction of the cost of a full-scale system and in return receiving economic and technical information regarding the system. In economic terms, prototyping is an option to hedge risk coming at a cost that needs to be properly assessed. Real options analysis is the project appraisal approach for these assessments. This paper aims to introduce and test an algorithm based on real options analysis to quantitatively assess the "option to prototype" in the energy sector. First, the interrelated research areas of prototyping, energy systems, and real options analysis are reviewed. Then, a novel algorithm is presented and applied to an innovative Generation Integrated Energy Storage system: Wind-driven Thermal Pumping to demonstrate the effectiveness of option to prototype and the main parameters influencing this decision. Results show that the cost of the prototype and the market size (number of identical systems to build) are key parameters. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [1] Aizpuru I, 2016, PCIM EUROPE 2016
  • [2] Alleman JJ, 1999, NEW INVESTMENT THEOR, DOI DOI 10.1007/B102437
  • [3] The latest advancements on thermochemical heat storage systems
    Aydin, Devrim
    Casey, Sean P.
    Riffat, Saffa
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 41 : 356 - 367
  • [4] Investment in electric energy storage under uncertainty: a real options approach
    Bakke I.
    Fleten S.-E.
    Hagfors L.I.
    Hagspiel V.
    Norheim B.
    Wogrin S.
    [J]. Computational Management Science, 2016, 13 (3) : 483 - 500
  • [5] Techno-economic assessment of solid-gas thermochemical energy storage systems for solar thermal power applications
    Bayon, Alicia
    Bader, Roman
    Jafarian, Mehdi
    Fedunik-Hofman, Larissa
    Sun, Yanping
    Hinkley, Jim
    Miller, Sarah
    Lipinski, Wojciech
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 149 : 473 - 484
  • [6] Benaroch M, 2002, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V19, P43
  • [7] Pumped Thermal Electricity Storage: A technology overview
    Benato, Alberto
    Stoppato, Anna
    [J]. THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2018, 6 : 301 - 315
  • [9] Bonasso M, 2017, OCEANS-IEEE
  • [10] Camburn B, 2017, DES SCI, V3, DOI 10.1017/dsj.2017.10