Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Prostate Cancer Imaging: Impact of b Values

被引:49
|
作者
Peng, Yahui [1 ]
Jiang, Yulei [2 ]
Antic, Tatjana [3 ]
Sethi, Ila [2 ]
Schmid-Tannwald, Christine [2 ]
Eggener, Scott [4 ]
Oto, Aytekin [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Dept Pathol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Dept Surg, Urol Sect, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
apparent diffusion coefficient; b value; Gleason score; monoexponential decay; prostate cancer; 3; T; TISSUES; GRADE;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.13.10917
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to investigate the effect of b values on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values estimated from 1.5-T diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) of the prostate acquired with an endorectal coil in distinguishing prostate cancer from normal-tissue regions of interest (ROIs) and the correlation of ADC values with the tumor Gleason score. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Pretreatment DWI studies were analyzed retrospectively in 51 consecutive patients with prostate cancer with either two (b = 0 and 1000 s/mm(2); n = 26 patients) or five (b = 0, 50, 200, 1500, and 2000 s/mm(2); n = 25 patients) b values. In 45 normal peripheral-zone ROIs and 65 prostate cancer ROIs (14 in the central gland), ADC values were estimated by use of several combinations of two or five b values and a monoexponential model. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to characterize the effectiveness of ADC values in distinguishing prostate cancer from normal-tissue ROIs, and we calculated Spearman rank-order correlation between ADC values and the Gleason score. RESULTS. ADC values were often significantly different (p < 0.001) when estimated from different combinations of two or five b values. However, except when both b values were less than or equal to 200 mm(2)/s or greater than or equal to 1500 mm(2)/s, the AUC value for distinguishing prostate cancer from normal-tissue ROIs was similar (0.88-0.93). The correlation coefficients between ADC values and the Gleason score were between -0.30 and -0.68. CONCLUSION. The choice of b values can significantly affect ADC estimates. ADC values can produce a similar discriminant performance in distinguishing prostate cancer from normal-tissue ROIs and in correlation with the Gleason score, but an appropriate ADC cutoff value needs to be selected specifically for each b-value combination.
引用
收藏
页码:W247 / W253
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values and Tumor Proliferation
    Wang, Xi Zhen
    Wang, Bin
    Gao, Zhi Qin
    Liu, Jin Gang
    Liu, Zuo Qin
    Niu, Qing Liang
    Sun, Zhen Kui
    Yuan, Yu Xiao
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 29 (06) : 1360 - 1366
  • [2] Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using apparent diffusion coefficient values: impact of patient race and age
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Prabhu, Vinay
    Li, Jianhong
    Babb, James S.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (06) : 1744 - 1751
  • [3] Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using apparent diffusion coefficient values: impact of patient race and age
    Tsutomu Tamada
    Vinay Prabhu
    Jianhong Li
    James S. Babb
    Samir S. Taneja
    Andrew B. Rosenkrantz
    Abdominal Radiology, 2017, 42 : 1744 - 1751
  • [4] Determination of the cutoff level of apparent diffusion coefficient values for detection of prostate cancer
    Nagayama, Masako
    Watanabe, Yuji
    Terai, Akito
    Araki, Tohru
    Notohara, Kenji
    Okumura, Akira
    Amoh, Yoshiki
    Ishimori, Takayoshi
    Nakashita, Satoru
    Dodo, Yoshihiro
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 29 (07) : 488 - 494
  • [5] Determination of the cutoff level of apparent diffusion coefficient values for detection of prostate cancer
    Masako Nagayama
    Yuji Watanabe
    Akito Terai
    Tohru Araki
    Kenji Notohara
    Akira Okumura
    Yoshiki Amoh
    Takayoshi Ishimori
    Satoru Nakashita
    Yoshihiro Dodo
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2011, 29 : 488 - 494
  • [6] The Utility of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values in Discriminating Between Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissue
    Luczynska, Elzbieta
    Heinze-Paluchowska, Sylwia
    Domalik, Agnieszka
    Cwierz, Anna
    Kasperkiewicz, Hanna
    Blecharz, Pawel
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 79 : 450 - 455
  • [7] Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in prostate diseases characterization on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Salvaggio, Giuseppe
    Calamia, Mauro
    Purpura, Pierpaolo
    Bartolotta, Tommaso V.
    Picone, Dario
    Dispensa, Nino
    Lunetta, Claudio
    Bruno, Alberto
    Raso, Ludovica
    Salvaggio, Leonardo
    Lo Re, Giuseppe
    Galia, Massimo
    Simonato, Alchiede
    Midiri, Massimo
    Lagalla, Roberto
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (02) : 154 - 160
  • [8] Association between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values on Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer
    Ng, W. K.
    Wong, C. K. K.
    Fung, E. P. Y.
    Wong, C. W.
    Mak, W. S.
    Kwok, K. M.
    Lam, H. S.
    Cho, H. Y.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 22 (02): : 98 - 106
  • [9] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Diffusion Weighted Imaging is Correlated with Disease Progression in Cervical Cancer Patients
    Ma, D. J.
    Esthappan, J.
    El Naqa, I.
    Zhu, J.
    Raptis, C.
    Yang, D.
    Apte, A.
    Deasy, J.
    Grigsby, P. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S399 - S399
  • [10] Clinical Utility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Can ADC Values Contribute to Assess the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer?
    Itou, Yasushi
    Nakanishi, Katsuyuki
    Narumi, Yoshifumi
    Nishizawa, Yasuko
    Tsukuma, Hideaki
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (01) : 167 - 172