The Impact of Resolving Subkilometer Processes on Aerosol-Cloud Interactions of Low-Level Clouds in Global Model Simulations

被引:12
作者
Terai, C. R. [1 ,2 ]
Pritchard, M. S. [1 ]
Blossey, P. [3 ]
Bretherton, C. S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Atmospher Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
COMMUNITY ATMOSPHERE MODEL; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS; CLIMATE MODEL; PRECIPITATION INTERACTIONS; WATER PATH; PARAMETERIZATION; SUPERPARAMETERIZATION; TURBULENCE; SUSCEPTIBILITY; MICROPHYSICS;
D O I
10.1029/2020MS002274
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Subkilometer processes are critical to the physics of aerosol-cloud interaction (ACI) but have been dependent on parameterizations in global model simulations. We thus report the strength of ACI in the Ultra-Parameterized Community Atmosphere Model (UPCAM), a multiscale climate model that uses coarse exterior resolution to embed explicit cloud-resolving models with enough resolution (250 m horizontal, 20 m vertical) to quasi-resolve subkilometer eddies. To investigate the impact on ACIs, UPCAM's simulations are compared to a coarser multiscale model with 4 km horizontal resolution. UPCAM produces cloud droplet number concentrations (N-d) and cloud liquid water path (LWP) values that are higher than the coarser model but equally plausible compared to observations. Our analysis focuses on the Northern Hemisphere (20-50 degrees N) oceans, where historical aerosol increases have been largest. We find similarities in the overall radiative forcing from ACIs in the two models, but this belies fundamental underlying differences. The radiative forcing from increases in LWP is weaker in UPCAM, whereas the forcing from increases in N-d is larger. Surprisingly, the weaker LWP increase is not due to a weaker increase in LWP in raining clouds, but a combination of weaker increase in LWP in nonraining clouds and a smaller fraction of raining clouds in UPCAM. The implication is that as global modeling moves toward finer than storm-resolving grids, nuanced model validation of ACI statistics conditioned on the existence of precipitation and good observational constraints on the baseline probability of precipitation will become key for tighter constraints and better conceptual understanding. Plain Language Summary How aerosol particles impact the climate through their interactions with clouds is a significant source of uncertainty in quantifying the drivers of climate change over the past hundred years. Global climate models have so far been heavily reliant on approximations of the physical processes that occur at subkilometer scales, even though processes at those scales are important for representing the physics behind aerosol-cloud interactions. To address this gap, we develop and run a multiscale global model that embeds a finer-scale model (250m in the horizontal and 20m in the vertical) within the columns of a coarser-resolution global model. A pair of simulations with preindustrial and present-day aerosol emissions is used to quantify the impact of human aerosol emissions. They show that the climate impact of resolving subkilometer resolutions is relatively small. However, this masks some key differences. The increase in cloud water with increasing aerosols is substantially weaker when subkilometer motions are resolved. Most of this weakening is due to a weaker response in nonraining clouds and there being fewer clouds that rain in the high-resolution model. The simulation results point to observations of specific processes that can help further constrain the impact of aerosols on clouds and climate.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [11] A comprehensive numerical study of aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions in marine stratocumulus
    Chen, Y. -C.
    Xue, L.
    Lebo, Z. J.
    Wang, H.
    Rasmussen, R. M.
    Seinfeld, J. H.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2011, 11 (18) : 9749 - 9769
  • [12] Chen YC, 2014, NAT GEOSCI, V7, P643, DOI [10.1038/NGEO2214, 10.1038/ngeo2214]
  • [13] Ensemble daily simulations for elucidating cloud-aerosol interactions under a large spread of realistic environmental conditions
    Dagan, Guy
    Stier, Philip
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2020, 20 (11) : 6291 - 6303
  • [14] Time-dependent, non-monotonic response of warm convective cloud fields to changes in aerosol loading
    Dagan, Guy
    Koren, Ilan
    Altaratz, Orit
    Heiblum, Reuven H.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2017, 17 (12) : 7435 - 7444
  • [15] The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system
    Dee, D. P.
    Uppala, S. M.
    Simmons, A. J.
    Berrisford, P.
    Poli, P.
    Kobayashi, S.
    Andrae, U.
    Balmaseda, M. A.
    Balsamo, G.
    Bauer, P.
    Bechtold, P.
    Beljaars, A. C. M.
    van de Berg, L.
    Bidlot, J.
    Bormann, N.
    Delsol, C.
    Dragani, R.
    Fuentes, M.
    Geer, A. J.
    Haimberger, L.
    Healy, S. B.
    Hersbach, H.
    Holm, E. V.
    Isaksen, L.
    Kallberg, P.
    Koehler, M.
    Matricardi, M.
    McNally, A. P.
    Monge-Sanz, B. M.
    Morcrette, J. -J.
    Park, B. -K.
    Peubey, C.
    de Rosnay, P.
    Tavolato, C.
    Thepaut, J. -N.
    Vitart, F.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 137 (656) : 553 - 597
  • [16] Elsaesser GS, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P10193, DOI [10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0902.1, 10.1175/jcli-d-16-0902.1]
  • [17] Grabowski WW, 2001, J ATMOS SCI, V58, P978, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<0978:CCPWTL>2.0.CO
  • [18] 2
  • [19] Remote Sensing of Droplet Number Concentration in Warm Clouds: A Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives
    Grosvenor, Daniel P.
    Sourdeval, Odran
    Zuidema, Paquita
    Ackerman, Andrew
    Alexandrov, Mikhail D.
    Bennartz, Ralf
    Boers, Reinout
    Cairns, Brian
    Chiu, J. Christine
    Christensen, Matthew
    Deneke, Hartwig
    Diamond, Michael
    Feingold, Graham
    Fridlind, Ann
    Huenerbein, Anja
    Knist, Christine
    Kollias, Pavlos
    Marshak, Alexander
    McCoy, Daniel
    Merk, Daniel
    Painemal, David
    Rausch, John
    Rosenfeld, Daniel
    Russchenberg, Herman
    Seifert, Patric
    Sinclair, Kenneth
    Stier, Philip
    van Diedenhoven, Bastiaan
    Wendisch, Manfred
    Werner, Frank
    Wood, Robert
    Zhang, Zhibo
    Quaas, Johannes
    [J]. REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 56 (02) : 409 - 453
  • [20] Surprising similarities in model and observational aerosol radiative forcing estimates
    Gryspeerdt, Edward
    Muelmenstadt, Johannes
    Gettelman, Andrew
    Malavelle, Florent F.
    Morrison, Hugh
    Neubauer, David
    Partridge, Daniel G.
    Stier, Philip
    Takemura, Toshihiko
    Wang, Hailong
    Wang, Minghuai
    Zhang, Kai
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2020, 20 (01) : 613 - 623