An efficient framework for conducting systematic literature reviews in agricultural sciences

被引:90
|
作者
Koutsos, Thomas M. [1 ]
Menexes, Georgios C. [1 ]
Dordas, Christos A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Hellas, Sch Agr, Fac Agr Forestry & Nat Environm, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Agricultural research; Systematic reviews; Meta-analysis; METAANALYSIS; TYPOLOGY; TRIALS; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.354
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Systematic review has generally been accepted as an effective, more complete, repeatable, and less biased type literature review that can successfully lead to evidence-based conclusions. This study attempts to develop a framework for systematic review with guidelines on how to conduct an effective systematic review for agricultural research. Systematic reviews require more time and effort but they can be used to conduct a comprehensive literature review, identifying potentially eligible articles on primary agricultural research and answering certain focused questions. A systematic review is also conducted as an example to examine whether systematic reviews are used in agricultural sciences. It was found that in the last two decades about a third (N = 29 out of 89 or 32.5%) of the eligible studies, classified as reviews related to agricultural research, are available as free full-text from publisher, while only eighteen of them were finally eligible to be included in this systematic review. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 117
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] There are challenges in conducting systematic reviews in developing countries: the Jamaican experience
    Bennett, Nadia R.
    Cumberbatch, Chisa
    Francis, Damian K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (09) : 1095 - 1098
  • [42] Conducting Systematic Reviews of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Common Pitfalls
    Wider, Barbara
    Boddy, Kate
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2009, 32 (04) : 417 - 430
  • [43] A framework for best evidence approaches can improve the transparency of systematic reviews
    Treadwell, Jonathan R.
    Singh, Sonal
    Talati, Ripple
    McPheeters, Melissa L.
    Reston, James T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (11) : 1159 - 1162
  • [44] Systematic reviews of the literature: an introduction to current methods
    Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
    Santesso, Nancy
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 194 (02) : 536 - 542
  • [45] Writing Systematic Reviews of the Literature-It Really Is a Systematic Process!
    Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2019, 32 (02) : 199 - 200
  • [46] Review of reviews: A systematic analysis of review papers in the hospitality and tourism literature
    Kim, Chloe Shinae
    Bai, Blake Hui
    Kim, Peter Beomcheol
    Chon, Kaye
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 70 : 49 - 58
  • [47] Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
    Gagnier, Joel J.
    Moher, David
    Boon, Heather
    Beyene, Joseph
    Bombardier, Claire
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [48] How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comprehensive step-by-step guide
    Gusenbauer, Michael
    Gauster, Sebastian P.
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2025, 212
  • [49] Optimal literature search for systematic reviews in surgery
    Käthe Goossen
    Solveig Tenckhoff
    Pascal Probst
    Kathrin Grummich
    André L. Mihaljevic
    Markus W. Büchler
    Markus K. Diener
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2018, 403 : 119 - 129
  • [50] Systematic Literature Reviews in Engineering Education and Other Developing Interdisciplinary Fields
    Borrego, Maura
    Foster, Margaret J.
    Froyd, Jeffrey E.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2014, 103 (01) : 45 - 76