An efficient framework for conducting systematic literature reviews in agricultural sciences

被引:90
|
作者
Koutsos, Thomas M. [1 ]
Menexes, Georgios C. [1 ]
Dordas, Christos A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Hellas, Sch Agr, Fac Agr Forestry & Nat Environm, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Agricultural research; Systematic reviews; Meta-analysis; METAANALYSIS; TYPOLOGY; TRIALS; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.354
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Systematic review has generally been accepted as an effective, more complete, repeatable, and less biased type literature review that can successfully lead to evidence-based conclusions. This study attempts to develop a framework for systematic review with guidelines on how to conduct an effective systematic review for agricultural research. Systematic reviews require more time and effort but they can be used to conduct a comprehensive literature review, identifying potentially eligible articles on primary agricultural research and answering certain focused questions. A systematic review is also conducted as an example to examine whether systematic reviews are used in agricultural sciences. It was found that in the last two decades about a third (N = 29 out of 89 or 32.5%) of the eligible studies, classified as reviews related to agricultural research, are available as free full-text from publisher, while only eighteen of them were finally eligible to be included in this systematic review. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 117
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and Evaluation of a Framework for Identifying and Addressing Spin for Harms in Systematic Reviews of Interventions
    Qureshi, Riaz
    Naaman, Kevin
    Quan, Nicolas G.
    Mayo-Wilson, Evan
    Page, Matthew J.
    Cornelius, Victoria
    Chou, Roger
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Golder, Su
    Bero, Lisa
    Doshi, Peter
    Vassar, Matt
    Reynders, Reint Meursinge
    Li, Tianjing
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 177 (08) : 1089 - 1098
  • [22] Questions and answers about conducting systematic reviews in sport and exercise psychology
    Gunnell, Katie
    Poitras, Veronica J.
    Tod, David
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 13 (01) : 297 - 318
  • [23] Literature searches in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A review, evaluation, and recommendations
    Harari, Michael B.
    Parola, Heather R.
    Hartwell, Christopher J.
    Riegelman, Amy
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 118
  • [24] Systematic Literature Reviews: Reflections, Recommendations, and Robustness Check
    Lim, Weng Marc
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR, 2025,
  • [25] Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews
    Haddaway, N. R.
    Woodcock, P.
    Macura, B.
    Collins, A.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (06) : 1596 - 1605
  • [26] Completeness of reporting of systematic reviews in the animal health literature: A meta-research study
    Sargeant, Jan M.
    Reynolds, Kristen
    Winder, Charlotte B.
    O'Connor, Annette M.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2021, 195
  • [27] PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
    Rethlefsen, Melissa L.
    Kirtley, Shona
    Waffenschmidt, Siw
    Ayala, Ana Patricia
    Moher, David
    Page, Matthew J.
    Koffel, Jonathan B.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [28] Development of a Framework for the Implementation of Synchronous Digital Mental Health: Realist Synthesis of Systematic Reviews
    Villarreal-Zegarra, David
    Alarcon-Ruiz, Christoper A.
    Melendez-Torres, G. J.
    Torres-Puente, Roberto
    Navarro-Flores, Alba
    Cavero, Victoria
    Ambrosio-Melgarejo, Juan
    Rojas-Vargas, Jefferson
    Almeida, Guillermo
    Albitres-Flores, Leonardo
    Romero-Cabrera, Alejandra B.
    Huarcaya-Victoria, Jeff
    JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2022, 9 (03):
  • [29] Conducting and interpreting high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Rajat Kalra
    Pankaj Arora
    Charity Morgan
    Fadi G. Hage
    Ami E. Iskandrian
    Navkaranbir S. Bajaj
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017, 24 : 471 - 481
  • [30] Writing Systematic Reviews of the Literature—It Really Is a Systematic Process!
    Elizabeth A. Krupinski
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2019, 32 : 199 - 200