An efficient framework for conducting systematic literature reviews in agricultural sciences

被引:90
|
作者
Koutsos, Thomas M. [1 ]
Menexes, Georgios C. [1 ]
Dordas, Christos A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Hellas, Sch Agr, Fac Agr Forestry & Nat Environm, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Agricultural research; Systematic reviews; Meta-analysis; METAANALYSIS; TYPOLOGY; TRIALS; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.354
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Systematic review has generally been accepted as an effective, more complete, repeatable, and less biased type literature review that can successfully lead to evidence-based conclusions. This study attempts to develop a framework for systematic review with guidelines on how to conduct an effective systematic review for agricultural research. Systematic reviews require more time and effort but they can be used to conduct a comprehensive literature review, identifying potentially eligible articles on primary agricultural research and answering certain focused questions. A systematic review is also conducted as an example to examine whether systematic reviews are used in agricultural sciences. It was found that in the last two decades about a third (N = 29 out of 89 or 32.5%) of the eligible studies, classified as reviews related to agricultural research, are available as free full-text from publisher, while only eighteen of them were finally eligible to be included in this systematic review. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 117
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Workshop in Conducting Integrative Literature Reviews
    Carliner, Saul
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (IPCC), 2011,
  • [2] Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review
    Xiao, Yu
    Watson, Maria
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (01) : 93 - 112
  • [3] An Evidence-Based Approach to Conducting Systematic Reviews on CKD
    Mani, Nandita S.
    Ginier, Emily
    ADVANCES IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE, 2016, 23 (06) : 355 - 362
  • [4] Optimal literature search for systematic reviews in surgery
    Goossen, Kaethe
    Tenckhoff, Solveig
    Probst, Pascal
    Grummich, Kathrin
    Mihaljevic, Andre L.
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Diener, Markus K.
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2018, 403 (01) : 119 - 129
  • [5] Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses
    Johnson, Blair T.
    Hennessy, Emily A.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2019, 233 : 237 - 251
  • [6] Benchmarking Librarian Support of Systematic Reviews in the Sciences, Humanities, and Social Sciences
    Le, Me-Linh
    Neilson, Christine J.
    Winkler, Janice
    COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2024, 85 (04): : 606 - 620
  • [7] A guide to conducting systematic reviews of clinical laboratory tests
    Don-Wauchope, Andrew C.
    Rodriguez-Capote, Karina
    Assaad, Ramy Samir
    Bhargava, Seema
    Zemlin, Annalise E.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2024, 62 (02) : 218 - 233
  • [8] Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach
    Cook, David A.
    West, Colin P.
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (10) : 943 - 952
  • [9] Conducting and interpreting high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Kalra, Rajat
    Arora, Pankaj
    Morgan, Charity
    Hage, Fadi G.
    Iskandrian, Ami E.
    Bajaj, Navkaranbir S.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (02) : 471 - 481
  • [10] Systematic reviews of the literature: what should be known about them
    Manterola, Carlos
    Astudillo, Paula
    Arias, Esteban
    Claros, Nataniel
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2013, 91 (03): : 149 - 155