Ninth-grade students' perceptions of the factors that led them to major in high school science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines

被引:34
作者
Caspi, Avner [1 ]
Gorsky, Paul [1 ,2 ]
Nitzani-Hendel, Rakefet [2 ]
Zacharia, Zacharias [3 ]
Rosenfeld, Sherman [2 ]
Berman, Shmuel [2 ]
Shildhouse, Bruria [4 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ Israel, Dept Educ & Psychol, Raanana, Israel
[2] Sci & Reasoning 2000, Bat Hefer, Israel
[3] Univ Cyprus, Dept Educ, Nicosia, Cyprus
[4] Eshkol Payis, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
关键词
ability grouping with curriculum differentiation; academic choice; Expectancy-Value Theory; gender; STEM learning; SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; ACHIEVEMENT; MOTIVATION; PERFORMANCE; ATTITUDES; PHYSICS; CHOICE; GIRLS; STEM;
D O I
10.1002/sce.21524
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
On completing middle-school (ninth grade), Israeli students must choose which discipline(s) to major in upon entering high school. This study, grounded in Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT), identified and modeled the factors that contributed to students' academic choices from their own subjective perspectives. We collected qualitative and quantitative data from ninth graders in two urban middle-schools (n=295) at the school year's end. We found that (a) most students cited interest and utility value as their main motivations for choosing a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) major, expectancies were mentioned less; (b) students who chose a STEM major had statistically significant higher scores for EVT's key predictor variables (personal attributes, "subjective task value," "expectation of success," perceived effects of environmental factors) than their counterparts who majored in non-STEM disciplines; (c) the positive perceptions of their peers' interest and ability in science contributed significantly to students' choice to major in STEM disciplines; and (d) no significant gender differences re academic choice were found. One highly unexpected finding emerged: Participation in advanced science programs for highly qualified students ("ability grouping with curriculum differentiation") was by far the most significant factor in the choice to major in STEM disciplines. This finding has major implications for science education policy and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1176 / 1205
页数:30
相关论文
共 146 条
[21]  
[Anonymous], 2015, INTEREST MATH SCI LE
[22]  
[Anonymous], 2007, PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow's world volume 1: Analysis, V1
[23]  
[Anonymous], 2012, FRAM K12 SCI ED
[24]  
[Anonymous], 2008, VISIBLE LEARNING SYN
[25]  
[Anonymous], INT J ED MATH SCI TE
[26]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Science education in Europe: National policies, practices and research
[27]  
[Anonymous], 2014, JAP ASS LANG TEACH J
[28]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[29]  
[Anonymous], TOM 98 HIGH COMM SCI
[30]  
[Anonymous], PAR INV SCI LEARN PO