From Social Investment to Investing in the Social: Insiders' Perceptions, Experiences, and Expectations

被引:3
作者
Postan-Aizik, Dassi [1 ]
Strier, Roni [2 ]
机构
[1] Max Stern Yezreel Valley Coll, Dept Social Work, Jezreel Valley, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Sch Social Work, Haifa, Israel
关键词
Social Investment; Social Inclusion; Social Exclusion; Neoliberalism; Communities; POVERTY REDUCTION; NEOLIBERALISM; PERSPECTIVE; INCLUSION; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1017/S0047279420000069
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Social investment is a policy approach intended to promote the social inclusion of excluded individuals and groups, mainly through labour market participation and long-term human capital development. Since the 1980's this approach has spread from Europe worldwide and is now regarded as the latest shift from both 'traditional' welfare and the unrestrained neoliberal policy implemented under the austerity regime of the last decades. Most social investment studies focus on the social and economic impacts of policy at the macro-level. This article takes a different perspective to examine how members of excluded communities experience social investment policy in their daily lives. The study analyzes qualitative data collected from a purposive sample of 96 participants from excluded communities in the North of Israel. Findings indicate that participants strongly support social investment ideas of inclusion via human capital development and the labour market. However, their experiences in both areas point to continued struggles with social mechanisms that marginalize them and reinforce multigenerational exclusion. Findings affirm critique of social investment when implemented without major structural changes. The study implications for policy suggest that, without such changes, the paradigmatic promises of social investment may further entrench social exclusion by replicating discriminatory and oppressive practices.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 284
页数:18
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, TRANSFORMATION WELFA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, POLITICS NEW WELFARE, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199645244.001.0001
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Inclusive Development Index 2018: Summary and Data Highlights
[4]  
Atkinson A., 2017, Monitoring social inclusion in Europe
[5]  
Ben-David D., 2013, DISCUSSION PAPERS EC
[6]  
Bonoli G., 2009, What Future for Social Investment?, P55
[7]   Conflictive preferences towards social investments and transfers in mature welfare states: The cases of unemployment benefits and childcare provision [J].
Busemeyer, Marius R. ;
Neimanns, Erik .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2017, 27 (03) :229-246
[8]   Three Shortcomings of the Social Investment Perspective [J].
Cantillon, Bea ;
Van Lancker, Wim .
SOCIAL POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 12 (04) :553-564
[9]  
Charmaz K., 2000, HDB QUALITATIVE RES, P509, DOI DOI 10.1177/0891241609342193
[10]  
Clasen J., 2011, REGULATING RISK UNEM, P1, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592296.001.0001