Despite Decreased Wait-List Times for Lung Transplantation, Lung Allocation Scores Continue to Increase

被引:35
作者
Iribarne, Alexander
Russo, Mark J.
Davies, Ryan R.
Hong, Kimberly N. [3 ,4 ]
Gelijns, Annetine C. [3 ,4 ]
Bacchetta, Matthew D.
D'Ovidio, Frank
Arcasoy, Selim [2 ]
Sonett, Joshua R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Med Ctr, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Surg, Div Pulm Allergy & Crit Care, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Int Ctr Hlth Outcomes & Innovat Res, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
lung allocation score; lung transplantation; organ allocation; wait-list time; MORTALITY; SEVERITY; DISEASE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1378/chest.08-2052
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: In May 2005, the lung allocation score (LAS) was introduced as a means of allocating donor lungs in order to decrease wait-list mortality, and prioritize candidates based on medical urgency and posttransplant survival. The purpose of this study, was to assess changes in recipient wait-list times and mean LAS since the introduction of the LAS model. Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing provided de-identified patient-level data. The study, population consisted of all patients in the United States with a reported LAS (n = 3529) undergoing lung transplantation between May, 7, 2005 and November 7, 2007. The study period was divided into 6-month intervals. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences in variables with nonparametric distributions. The nonparametric trends test was used to determine significance of trends over time. Results: There was a significant decrease in wait-list time during the study period, while LAS among transplant recipients increased (p < 0.001). There was no significant change in FVC (49.3 +/- 17.5%, p = 0.48) or pulmonary, capillary wedge pressure (11.1 +/- 5.8 mm Hg, p = 0.23); however, there was a significant increase in age (51.5 +/- 13.9 years, p +/- 0.001) during the study period. When stratified by, etiology, the LAS increased for both interstitial pulmonary fibrosis and COPD patients (p < 0.001). Moreover, the overall number of patients listed for transplantation as well as the LAS among transplant candidates increased (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Two years after initiation of the LAS model, wait-list times continue to decrease while mean LAS continued to increase. This increase in LAS among transplant recipients was observed most notably in patients.,with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis and COPD, and reflected in an increased mean LAS at the time of listing.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 928
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Aris R, 1998, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V158, P335
  • [2] Organ allocation in lung transplant
    Davis, Steven Q.
    Garrity, Edward R., Jr.
    [J]. CHEST, 2007, 132 (05) : 1646 - 1651
  • [3] Listing for lung transplantation: Life expectancy and transplant effect, stratified by type of end-stage lung disease, the eurotransplant experience
    De Meester, J
    Smits, JMA
    Persijn, GG
    Haverich, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 20 (05) : 518 - 524
  • [4] Development of the new lung allocation system in the United States
    Egan, TM
    Murray, S
    Bustami, RT
    Shearon, TH
    McCullough, KR
    Edwards, LB
    Coke, MA
    Garrity, ER
    Sweet, SC
    Heiney, DA
    Grover, FL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (05) : 1212 - 1227
  • [5] Pro/con debate: Lung allocation should be based on medical urgency and transplant survival and not on waiting time
    Egan, TM
    Kotloff, RM
    [J]. CHEST, 2005, 128 (01) : 407 - 415
  • [6] Lung allocation score for lung transplantation - Impact on disease severity and survival
    Gries, Cynthia J.
    Mulligan, Michael S.
    Edelman, Jeffrey D.
    Raghu, Ganesh
    Curtis, J. Randall
    Goss, Christopher H.
    [J]. CHEST, 2007, 132 (06) : 1954 - 1961
  • [7] Early results of lung transplantation after implementation of the new lung allocation score
    Hadjiliadis, D.
    Ahya, V. N.
    Christie, J. D.
    Sager, J. D.
    Poccbettino, A.
    Kotloff, R. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 25 (02) : S173 - S174
  • [8] The impact of the lung allocation score on short-term transplantation outcomes: A multicenter study
    Kozower, Benjamin D.
    Meyers, Bryan F.
    Smith, Michael A.
    De Oliveira, Nilto C.
    Cassivi, Stephen D.
    Guthrie, Tracey J.
    Wang, Honkung
    Ryan, Beverly J.
    Shen, K. Robert
    Daniel, Thomas M.
    Jones, David R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 135 (01) : 166 - 171
  • [9] Analytical methods and database design: Implications for transplant researchers, 2005
    Levine, GN
    McCullough, KP
    Rodgers, AM
    Dickinson, DM
    Ashby, VB
    Schaubel, DE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (05) : 1228 - 1242
  • [10] Effects of lung allocation score on waiting list rankings and transplant procedures
    Lingaraju, Rajiv
    Blumenthal, Nancy P.
    Kotloff, Robert M.
    Christie, Jason
    Ahya, Vivek N.
    Sager, Jeffrey S.
    Pochettino, Alberto
    Hadjiliadis, Denis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 25 (09) : 1167 - 1170