How Secure are Unproctored Pre-Employment Tests? Analysis of Inconsistent Test Scores

被引:2
作者
Kantrowitz, Tracy M. [1 ]
Dainis, Amanda M. [1 ]
机构
[1] CEB, Alpharetta, GA 30022 USA
关键词
Personnel selection; Test security; Computer adaptive test; COGNITIVE-ABILITY; INTERNET TESTS; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s10869-014-9365-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Employment tests have long been scrutinized for psychometric considerations such as validity and reliability, but the extent to which cheating may occur on pre-employment tests has generally been overlooked. With the rise of unproctored, on-demand, online testing, the need has never been greater to focus on design and process considerations that can help mitigate the potential for cheating on employment tests. This paper builds on the limited existing research on the detection of inconsistent test scores on unproctored Internet testing. Job candidates (n = 4,026) completed a computer adaptive cognitive ability test under two conditions: an unproctored screening test followed by a proctored confirmation test. Analyses focused on detecting instances of inconsistent test scores based on comparison of standard errors of measure for the unproctored and proctored test scores (Guo and Drasgow, Int J Sel Assess 18:351-364, 2010). Results revealed a relatively low number of inconsistent scores and are discussed in the context of future research, application, and theory building on the nature of cheating on pre-employment tests.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 616
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, ATP TEST SEC SURV RE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, CHEATING TESTS DO IT
  • [3] The Magnitude and Extent of Cheating and Response Distortion Effects on Unproctored Internet-Based Tests of Cognitive Ability and Personality
    Arthur, Winfred, Jr.
    Glaze, Ryan M.
    Villado, Anton J.
    Taylor, Jason E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2010, 18 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [4] Proctored Versus Unproctored Internet Tests: Are unproctored noncognitive tests as predictive of job performance?
    Beaty, James C.
    Nye, Christopher D.
    Borneman, Matthew J.
    Kantrowitz, Tracy M.
    Drasgow, Fritz
    Grauer, Eyal
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2011, 19 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [5] Recovering the Scientist-Practitioner Model: How IOs Should Respond to Unproctored Internet Testing
    Beaty, James C.
    Dawson, Craig R.
    Fallaw, Sarah S.
    Kantrowitz, Tracy M.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2009, 2 (01): : 58 - 63
  • [6] International Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing
    Coyne, Iain
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TESTING, 2006, 6 (02) : 143 - 171
  • [7] Cheating on Proctored Tests: The Other Side of the Unproctored Debate
    Drasgow, Fritz
    Nye, Christopher D.
    Guo, Jing
    Tay, Louis
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2009, 2 (01): : 46 - 48
  • [8] Fallaw S., 2012, TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [9] Fetzer M., 2010, PreVisor ConVerge: The best practice for unproctored/unsupervised internet testing
  • [10] Conspiracies and Test Compromise: An Evaluation of the Resistance of Test Systems to Small-scale Cheating
    Guo, Jing
    Tay, Louis
    Drasgow, Fritz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TESTING, 2009, 9 (04) : 283 - 309