Lifitegrast for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease Results of a Phase III, Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Trial (OPUS-3)

被引:139
作者
Holland, Edward J. [1 ]
Luchs, Jodi [2 ]
Karpecki, Paul M. [3 ]
Nichols, Kelly K. [4 ]
Jackson, Mitchell A. [5 ]
Sall, Kenneth [6 ]
Tauber, Joseph [7 ]
Roy, Monica [8 ]
Raychaudhuri, Aparna [8 ]
Shojaei, Amir [8 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Eye Inst, Edgewood, KY USA
[2] South Shore Eye Care, Wantagh, NY USA
[3] Kentucky Eye Inst, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Optometry, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[5] Jacksoneye, Lake Villa, IL USA
[6] Sall Res Med Ctr Inc, Artesia, CA USA
[7] Tauber Eye Ctr, Kansas City, MO USA
[8] Shire, 300 Shire Way, Lexington, MA 02421 USA
关键词
OPHTHALMIC SOLUTION 5.0-PERCENT; OCULAR IRRITATION; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.025
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Lifitegrast is a lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 antagonist developed to reduce inflammation in dry eye disease (DED). We report the results of OPUS-3 (NCT02284516), a phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of lifitegrast versus placebo in participants with DED. Design: Twelve-week, phase III, randomized, double-masked, multicenter, placebo-controlled study. Participants: Adults aged >= 18 years with Schirmer tear test (without anesthesia) >= 1 and <= 10 mm, corneal fluorescein staining score >= 2.0 (0-4 scale), eye dryness score (EDS) >= 40 (0-100 visual analogue scale [VAS]), and history of artificial tear use within 30 days of study entry. Methods: After a 14-day placebo run-in, participants were randomized 1: 1 to lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5.0% or placebo twice daily for 84 days. Main Outcome Measures: The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline to day 84 in EDS. Key secondary efficacy end points were change from baseline to days 42 and 14 in EDS. Other secondary efficacy end points included additional VAS items (burning/stinging, itching, foreign body sensation, eye discomfort, photophobia, pain), ocular discomfort score (ODS), and safety/tolerability of lifitegrast versus placebo. Results: In the study, 711 participants were randomized: placebo, 356; lifitegrast, 355 (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). At day 84, lifitegrast-treated participants experienced significantly greater improvement from baseline in EDS versus those receiving placebo (treatment effect [TE], 7.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04-11.28; P = 0.0007). Mean changes from baseline in EDS also significantly favored lifitegrast on days 42 (TE, 9.32; 95% CI, 5.44-13.20; P < 0.0001) and 14 (TE, 7.85; 95% CI, 4.33-11.37; P < 0.0001). No statistically significant differences were observed in ODS between treatment groups at days 84, 42, or 14. A greater improvement was observed in lifitegrast-treated participants at day 42 in itching (nominal P = 0.0318), foreign body sensation (nominal P = 0.0418), and eye discomfort (P = 0.0048) versus participants receiving placebo. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity; no serious ocular adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Lifitegrast significantly improved symptoms of eye dryness, as measured by EDS, versus placebo in participants with DED. Improvement in EDS was observed as early as day 14. Lifitegrast appeared well tolerated. (C) 2016 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 60
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Use of the dry eye questionnaire to measure symptoms of ocular irritation in patients with aqueous tear deficient dry eye [J].
Begley, CG ;
Caffery, B ;
Chalmers, RL ;
Mitchell, GL .
CORNEA, 2002, 21 (07) :664-670
[2]   Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey [J].
Begley, CG ;
Caffery, B ;
Nichols, KK ;
Chalmers, R .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2000, 77 (01) :40-46
[3]   Safety of Lifitegrast Ophthalmic Solution 5.0% in Patients With Dry Eye Disease: A 1-Year, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study [J].
Donnenfeld, Eric D. ;
Karpecki, Paul M. ;
Majmudar, Parag A. ;
Nichols, Kelly K. ;
Raychaudhuri, Aparna ;
Roy, Monica ;
Semba, Charles P. .
CORNEA, 2016, 35 (06) :741-748
[4]   Economic and Humanistic Burden of Dry Eye Disease in Europe, North America, and Asia: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
McDonald, Marguerite ;
Patel, Dipen A. ;
Keith, Michael S. ;
Snedecor, Sonya J. .
OCULAR SURFACE, 2016, 14 (02) :144-167
[5]   Patient-reported symptoms in dry dye disease [J].
Nichols, Kelly K. .
OCULAR SURFACE, 2006, 4 (03) :137-145
[6]   The lack of association between signs and symptoms in patients with dry eye disease [J].
Nichols, KK ;
Nichols, JJ ;
Mitchell, GL .
CORNEA, 2004, 23 (08) :762-770
[7]   Symptoms of ocular irritation in patients diagnosed with dry eye [J].
Nichols, KK ;
Begley, CG ;
Caffery, B ;
Jones, LA .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1999, 76 (12) :838-844
[8]   Lifitegrast, a Novel Integrin Antagonist for Treatment of Dry Eye Disease [J].
Perez, Victor L. ;
Pflugfelder, Stephen C. ;
Zhang, Steven ;
Shojaei, Amir ;
Haque, Reza .
OCULAR SURFACE, 2016, 14 (02) :207-215
[9]  
Pflugfelder SC, 2007, OCUL SURF, V5, P163
[10]   A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Study of a Novel Integrin Antagonist (SAR 1118) for the Treatment of Dry Eye [J].
Semba, Charles P. ;
Torkildsen, Gail L. ;
Lonsdale, John D. ;
McLaurin, Eugene B. ;
Geffin, Joel A. ;
Mundorf, Thomas K. ;
Kennedy, Kathryn S. ;
Ousler, George W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 153 (06) :1050-1060