Cost-effectiveness of screening tools for identifying depression in early pregnancy: a decision tree model

被引:10
作者
Heslin, Margaret [1 ]
Jin, Huajie [1 ]
Trevillion, Kylee [1 ]
Ling, Xiaoxiao [2 ]
Nath, Selina [3 ]
Barrett, Barbara [1 ]
Demilew, Jill [4 ]
Ryan, Elizabeth G. [5 ]
O'Connor, Sheila [4 ]
Sands, Polly [6 ]
Milgrom, Jeannette [7 ,8 ]
Bick, Debra [9 ,10 ]
Stanley, Nicky [11 ]
Hunter, Myra S. [12 ]
Howard, Louise M. [1 ]
Byford, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Hlth Serv & Populat Res Dept, 16 De Crespigny Pk, London SE5 8AF, England
[2] UCL, Dept Stat Sci, London, England
[3] UCL Great Ormond St Inst Child Hlth, Populat Policy & Practice Res & Teaching Dept, London, England
[4] Kings Coll Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[5] Univ Queensland, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[6] Guys & St ThomasNHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[7] Austin Hlth, Parent Infant Res Inst, Heidelberg West, Vic, Australia
[8] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ Warwick, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[10] Univ Hosp Coventry & Warwick NHS Fdn Trust, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[11] Univ Cent Lancashire, Sch Social Work Care & Community, Preston, Lancs, England
[12] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosc, Dept Psychol, Guys Campus, London SE1 9RT, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Decision analytic model; Depression; Pregnancy; Screening; Whooley; EPDS; POSTNATAL DEPRESSION; MENTAL-DISORDERS; PRIMARY-CARE; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; HEALTH; WOMEN; RISK; QUESTIONS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-022-08115-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Although the effectiveness of screening tools for detecting depression in pregnancy has been investigated, there is limited evidence on the cost-effectiveness. This is vital in providing full information to decision makers. This study aimed to explore the cost-effectiveness of different screening tools to identify depression in early pregnancy compared to no screening. Methods A decision tree was developed to model the identification and treatment pathways of depression from the first antenatal appointment to 3-months postpartum using the Whooley questions, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Whooley questions followed by the EPDS, compared to no screening. The economic evaluation took an NHS and Personal Social Services perspective. Model parameters were taken from a combination of sources including a cross-sectional survey investigating the diagnostic accuracy of screening tools, and other published literature. Cost-effectiveness was assessed in terms of the incremental cost per quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost-effectiveness planes and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were produced using a net-benefit approach based on Monte Carlo simulations of cost-outcome data. Results In a 4-way comparison, the Whooley, EPDS and Whooley followed by the EPDS each had a similar probability of being cost-effective at around 30% for willingness to pay values from 20,000-30,000 pound per QALY compared to around 20% for the no screen option. Conclusions All three screening approaches tested had a higher probability of being cost-effective than the no-screen option. In the absence of a clear cost-effectiveness advantage for any one of the three screening options, the choice between the screening approaches could be made on other grounds, such as clinical burden of the screening options. Limitations include data availability and short time horizon, thus further research is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013 The-reference-case
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Antenatal and postnatal mental health: Clinical management and service guidance
[3]   Effect of the addition of a "help" question to two screening questions on specificity for diagnosis of depression in general practice: diagnostic validity study [J].
Arroll, B ;
Goodyear-Smith, F ;
Kerse, N ;
Fishman, T ;
Gunn, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7521) :884-886A
[4]   Screening for. depression in primary care with two verbally asked questions: cross sectional study [J].
Arroll, B ;
Khin, N ;
Kerse, N .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7424) :1144-1146
[5]   When should women be screened for postnatal depression? [J].
Bick, Debra ;
Howard, Louise .
EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2010, 10 (02) :151-154
[6]  
Briggs AH, 1999, HEALTH ECON, V8, P257, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199905)8:3<257::AID-HEC427>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-E
[8]   The impact of maternal depression on familial relationships [J].
Burke, L .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 15 (03) :243-255
[9]  
Burns, 2018, UNIT COSTS HLTH SOCI
[10]   A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) [J].
Claxton, K ;
Sculpher, M ;
Drummond, M .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9334) :711-715