A Regional Analysis of the Response of Soybean Yield to Planting Date

被引:117
作者
Egli, D. B. [1 ]
Cornelius, P. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dep Plant & Soil Sci, Lexington, KY 40546 USA
关键词
CULTIVAR MATURITY; SEED; INDETERMINATE; DETERMINATE; SYSTEMS; DURATION; GROWTH;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2008.0148
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Planting date is a critical aspect of all soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production systems, but the response of yield to planting date fluctuates widely among environments. A combined analysis of many planting date experiments will provide a better estimate of the average response. Data from 28 nonirrigated planting date experiments that were conducted for more than 1 yr with at least three planting dates (a minimum of one in June) were combined by regions (Midwest, 9; Upper South, 10; Deep South, 9) for analysis. Experiments using the early soybean production system (ESPS) were not included. A segmented-linear regression model with two segments was used to determine when yield began a rapid decline as planting was delayed. The rapid decline began on 30 May in the Midwest, 7 June in the Upper South, and 27 May in the Deep South. The rate of decline was larger in the Upper South (1.1) and Deep South (1.2) than it was in the Midwest (0.7% points per day). Yield trends before the rapid decline began showed no significant advantage for early plantings. Only 23% of the April or early (first week) May plantings exhibited higher yields than later plantings and the average advantage was 7%. The average response to planting date was remarkably similar across all regions and there seems to be no consistent advantage for ultra-early planting dates with traditional cultivars, but there was a significant penalty for planting after the critical date in late May or early June.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 335
页数:6
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Soybean sowing date: The vegetative, reproductive, and agronomic impacts [J].
Bastidas, A. M. ;
Setryono, T. D. ;
Dobermann, A. ;
Cassman, K. G. ;
Elmore, R. W. ;
Graef, G. L. ;
Specht, J. E. .
CROP SCIENCE, 2008, 48 (02) :727-740
[2]   SOYBEAN RESPONSE TO DIFFERENT PLANTING PATTERNS AND DATES [J].
BEATTY, KD ;
ELDRIDGE, IL ;
SIMPSON, AM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (05) :859-862
[3]   RESPONSE OF DETERMINATE AND INDETERMINATE SOYBEANS TO VARYING CULTURAL-PRACTICES IN THE NORTHERN USA [J].
BEAVER, JS ;
JOHNSON, RR .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1981, 73 (05) :833-838
[4]  
BEUERLEIN J E, 1988, Journal of Production Agriculture, V1, P300
[5]   IRRIGATION, ROW SPACING, AND GENOTYPE EFFECTS ON LATE AND ULTRA-LATE PLANTED SOYBEANS [J].
BOERMA, HR ;
ASHLEY, DA .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (06) :995-999
[6]  
Boote K. J., 1998, Agricultural systems modeling and simulation., P651
[7]   SELECTED DETERMINATE SOYBEAN CULTIVAR YIELD RESPONSES TO ROW SPACINGS AND PLANTING DATES [J].
BOQUET, DJ ;
KOONCE, KL ;
WALKER, DM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (01) :136-138
[8]   Development, growth and yield of late-sown soybean in the southern Pampas [J].
Calviño, PA ;
Sadras, VO ;
Andrade, FH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2003, 19 (02) :265-275
[9]  
CARTTER JACKSON L., 1962, ADVANCES AGRON, V14, P359, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60442-3
[10]   Soybean seed yield response to planting date and seeding rate in the upper Midwest [J].
De Bruin, Jason L. ;
Pedersen, Palle .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2008, 100 (03) :696-703