Understanding and application of CO2 adsorption capacity estimation models for coal types

被引:34
作者
De Silva, P. N. K. [1 ]
Ranjith, P. G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London, Int Energy Policy Inst, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Deep Earth Energy Res Lab, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Geosequestration; Coal; Adsorption capacity; Fugacity; DUBININ-RADUSHKEVICH EQUATION; ARGONNE PREMIUM COALS; CARBON-DIOXIDE; SORPTION CAPACITY; METHANE RECOVERY; STORAGE CAPACITY; MIXTURES; NITROGEN; DRY; SEQUESTRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2013.11.051
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Geosequestration is an attractive mechanism to store CO2 for geologically significant time periods in order to minimise climate changing impacts on the environment. Reservoirs such as coal seams are used as storage reservoirs. However, it is very important to estimate the quantity of CO2 that can be stored in a coal reservoir. In this study, existing storage models such as correlation models and Equations of State (EOSs) in the context of different coal types are compared, together with the experimentally-observed isotherms. Under highly dense phase non-ideal conditions, CO2 storage potential will be maximised. Therefore, the use of fugacity in place of pressure is suggested to estimate CO2 storage capacity under highly dense phase conditions. Further, four new modified correlation type models are suggested and found to be of good agreement with existing correlation-type adsorption models such as the DR and Toth models. By using various adsorbed phase density values, it was found that use of value as 1.028 g/cm(3) gave the most consistent results across all the proposed isotherm equations. Fugacity did not improve the results for the correlation models, nor did it worsen them. The correlation models were clearly less accurate than the EOS adsorption models, especially under highly dense phase conditions. For less dense phase conditions, all the isotherm models gave comparable results to the experimental adsorption isotherms, while for highly dense phase conditions there were varying results. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 259
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], TASKF REV DEV STAND
[2]  
[Anonymous], OKLAHOMA STATE U SCH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTU
[4]  
Arri L.E., 1992, SPE ROCKY MOUNTAIN R
[5]   Carbon dioxide storage capacity in uneconomic coal beds in Alberta, Canada: Methodology, potential and site identification [J].
Bachu, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (03) :374-385
[6]   CO2 storage capacity estimation:: Methodology and gaps [J].
Bachu, Stefan ;
Bonijoly, Didier ;
Bradshaw, John ;
Burruss, Robert ;
Holloway, Sam ;
Christensen, Niels Peter ;
Mathiassen, Odd Magne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (04) :430-443
[7]   Methane and CO2 sorption and desorption measurements on dry Argonne premium coals:: pure components and mixtures [J].
Busch, A ;
Gensterblum, Y ;
Krooss, BM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2003, 55 (2-4) :205-224
[8]   Practical Modeling Approaches for Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide [J].
Celia, Michael A. ;
Nordbotten, Jan M. .
GROUND WATER, 2009, 47 (05) :627-638
[9]   Effect of coal properties on CO2 sorption capacity under supercritical conditions [J].
Day, Stuart ;
Duffy, Greg ;
Sakurovs, Richard ;
Weir, Steve .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2008, 2 (03) :342-352
[10]   A study of methodologies for CO2 storage capacity estimation of coal [J].
De Silva, P. N. K. ;
Ranjith, P. G. ;
Choi, S. K. .
FUEL, 2012, 91 (01) :1-15