Usefulness of anti-dsDNA antibody screening with chemiluminescence followed by confirmation by indirect immunofluorescence

被引:1
作者
Monteiro Callado, Maria Roseli [1 ]
Costa Lima, Jose Rubens [2 ]
de Alencar Barroso, Maria Nancy [3 ]
Mota Pinheiro, Antonio Tiago [4 ]
da Cruz Neto, Moises Francisco [4 ]
de Lima Abreu, Maria Arenilda [3 ]
Vieira, Walber Pinto [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Municipal Dept Hlth Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[3] Hosp Geral Fortaleza, Clin Pathol Lab, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[5] Hosp Geral Fortaleza, Rheumatol Unit, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[6] Univ Estadual Ceara, Sch Med, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
关键词
Anti-dsDNA; Autoimmune diseases; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Chemiluminescence; Indirect immunofluorescence; SYSTEMIC-LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS; LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY; IMMUNOASSAYS; DIAGNOSIS; TESTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) to detect anti-dsDNA antibodies, using the indirect immunofluorescence test (IF) on Crithidia luciliae as a reference. Methods: The automation system demonstrated 81% efficiency, 100% sensitivity and 82% specificity according to the intrinsic validation process performed using 179 consecutive samples from 169 patients in the beginning of 2011. These patients were subsequently divided into 3 groups according to the co-reactivity of anti-dsDNA results using the 2 methods (reactive, non-reactive and discrepant results). Results: Upon data analysis, 77% (129/169) of the tests were requested by rheumatologists, and 57% (97/169) of the samples were from lupus patients. Both the reactive and non-reactive results of the CLIA were well defined and standardised, and automation reduced the manual labor required by 70% in a safe and high-quality manner. Furthermore, the high prevalence of patients with lupus and nephritis among the CLIA false-positive results corroborates the hypothesis that the actual index of CLIA false positivity is lower than that initially found in this study. (C) 2013 Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 418
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical significance of ELISA positive and immunofluorescence negative anti-dsDNA antibody
    Kim, Kyeong Hee
    Han, Jin Yeong
    Kim, Jeong Man
    Lee, Sung Won
    Chung, Won Tae
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2007, 380 (1-2) : 182 - 185
  • [2] Evaluation of Anti-dsDNA Antibody Tests: Crithidia luciliae Immunofluorescence Test, Immunoblot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Chemiluminescence Immunoassay
    Yang, Jin-young
    Oh, Eun-Jee
    Kim, Yonggoo
    Park, Yeon-Joon
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2010, 30 (06): : 675 - 684
  • [3] Detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies: evaluation of performance of a chemiluminescent immunoassay and correlation to the indirect immunofluorescence assay
    Martinez Methol, Maria Soledad
    Ventimiglia, Fernando Daniel
    Aristimuno, Ana Maria
    de la Colina, Amelia Noemi
    D'Agostino, Liliana Elena
    ACTA BIOQUIMICA CLINICA LATINOAMERICANA, 2021, 55 (01): : 21 - 29
  • [4] A comparison of the chemiluminescence immunoassay and Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test in detecting anti-dsDNA antibodies and assessing the activity of systemic lupus erythematosus
    He, Shiyi
    Wu, Xiaoning
    Li, Limin
    Jiang, Kongmei
    He, Qitian
    Xie, Li
    LUPUS, 2023, 32 (08) : 936 - 941
  • [5] Detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies by computer-aided automated immunofluorescence analysis
    Lakos, Gabriella
    Gonzalez, Marlene
    Flaherty, David
    Bentow, Chelsea
    Ibarra, Claudia
    Stimson, Deborah
    Nacario, Lori
    Hiemann, Rico
    Dervieux, Thierry
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 2016, 433 : 17 - 22
  • [6] The clinical relevance of anti-dsDNA antibodies determined by the Elia™ dsDNA assay in patients with negative indirect immunofluorescence on the HEp-2 cell
    Robier, Christoph
    Haas, Maximiliane
    Quehenberger, Franz
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 59 (03) : 541 - 546
  • [7] Anti-dsDNA antibody testing in the clinic: Farr or ELISA?
    Mahler, Michael
    Fritzler, Marvin J.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 3 (02): : 72 - 73
  • [8] Anti-dsDNA antibody testing by Farr and ELISA techniques is not equivalent
    Neogi, Tuhina
    Gladman, Dafna D.
    Ibanez, Dominique
    Urowitz, Murray
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2006, 33 (09) : 1785 - 1788
  • [9] Comparison of current methods for anti-dsDNA antibody detection and reshaping diagnostic strategies
    Infantino, Maria
    Palterer, Boaz
    Previtali, Giulia
    Alessio, Maria-Grazia
    Villalta, Danilo
    Carbone, Teresa
    Platzgummer, Stefan
    Paura, Giusi
    Castiglione, Caterina
    Fabris, Martina
    Pesce, Giampaola
    Porcelli, Brunetta
    Terzuoli, Lucia
    Bacarelli, Maria-Romana
    Tampoia, Marilina
    Cinquanta, Luigi
    Brusca, Ignazio
    Buzzolini, Francesca
    Benucci, Maurizio
    Tortora, Matteo
    Tronchin, Lorenzo
    Guarrasi, Valerio
    Soda, Paolo
    Manfredi, Mariangela
    Bizzaro, Nicola
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 96 (06)
  • [10] International multi-center evaluation of a novel chemiluminescence assay for the detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies
    Bentow, C.
    Lakos, G.
    Martis, P.
    Wahl, E.
    Garcia, M.
    Vinas, O.
    Espinosa, G.
    Cervera, R.
    Sjowall, C.
    Carmona-Fernandes, D.
    Santos, M. J.
    Hanly, J. G.
    Mahler, M.
    LUPUS, 2016, 25 (08) : 864 - 872