The prostate specific antigen era in the United States is over for prostate cancer: What happened in the last 20 years?

被引:404
作者
Stamey, TA [1 ]
Caldwell, M [1 ]
McNeal, JE [1 ]
Nolley, R [1 ]
Hemenez, M [1 ]
Downs, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms; biological markers; prostatic hyperplasia;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000139993.51181.5d
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We assessed how well preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) reflects the largest cancer in consecutive untreated radical prostatectomies during the last 20 years at Stanford University. Materials and Methods: A total of 1,317 consecutive radical prostatectomies were divided into 4, 5-year periods between August 1983 and July 2003, and examined sequentially in 3 mm step sections by 1 pathologist. The largest cancer and 5 other histological variables in each prostate were measured. Preoperative clinical stages were tabulated for each 5-year period. Means, Pearson correlation coefficients, % change and multiple regression were used to compare selected variables. Results: Most parameters decreased linearly during the 20 years, including palpable nodules on digital rectal examination from 91% to 17%, mean age from 64 to 59 years, mean serum PSA from 25 to 8 ng/ml, and index (largest) cancer volume from 5.3 to 2.4 cc. Percent Gleason grade 4/5 of the largest cancer averaged 27% to 35% and prostate weight 44 to 53 gm. Contrasting August 1983 to December 1988 with January 1999 to July 2003, 6 histological cancer parameters had statistically significant relationships to serum PSA in the first period. In the last 5 years serum PSA was related only to prostate size. Conclusions: Serum PSA was related to prostate cancer 20 years ago. In the last 5 years serum PSA has only been related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. There is an urgent need for serum markers that reflect the size and grade of this ubiquitous cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1297 / 1301
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Collins MM, 1997, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V278, P1516, DOI 10.1001/jama.278.18.1516
[2]   RANDOM SYSTEMATIC VERSUS DIRECTED ULTRASOUND GUIDED TRANS-RECTAL CORE BIOPSIES OF THE PROSTATE [J].
HODGE, KK ;
MCNEAL, JE ;
TERRIS, MK ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (01) :71-75
[3]   Patterns of spread of adenocarcinoma in the prostate as related to cancer volume [J].
McNeal, JE ;
Haillot, O .
PROSTATE, 2001, 49 (01) :48-57
[4]   Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers [J].
Noguchi, M ;
Stamey, TA ;
McNeal, JE ;
Yemoto, CM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05) :1596-1600
[5]   An analysis of 148 consecutive transition zone cancers: Clinical and histological characteristics [J].
Noguchi, M ;
Stamey, TA ;
McNeal, JE ;
Yemoto, CEM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (06) :1751-1755
[6]   Limitations of serum prostate specific antigen in predicting peripheral and transition zone cancer volumes as measured by correlation coefficients [J].
Noldus, J ;
Stamey, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (01) :232-237
[7]   Positive prostate biopsy rate consistently increases with age at the same prostate-specific antigen level in patients with normal digital rectal examination [J].
Orozco, R ;
Kunnel, B ;
O'Dowd, GJ ;
Stamey, TA .
UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (04) :531-533
[8]   Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: Results of a community multi-practice study [J].
Presti, JC ;
O'Dowd, GJ ;
Miller, MC ;
Mattu, R ;
Veltri, RW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (01) :125-129
[9]   Effect of verification bias on screening for prostate cancer by measurement of prostate-specific antigen [J].
Punglia, RS ;
D'Amico, AV ;
Catalona, WJ ;
Roehl, KA ;
Kuntz, KM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (04) :335-342
[10]   On the frequency of occurrence of occult carcinoma of the prostate [J].
Rich, AR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1935, 33 (03) :215-223