Six years of conservation agriculture and nutrient management in maize-mustard rotation: Impact on soil properties, system productivity and profitability

被引:25
作者
Pooniya, Vijay [1 ]
Biswakarma, Niraj [1 ]
Parihar, C. M. [1 ]
Swarnalakshmi, Karivaradharajan [1 ]
Lama, Achal [2 ]
Zhiipao, R. R. [1 ]
Nath, Amlan [1 ]
Pal, Madan [1 ]
Jat, S. L. [3 ]
Satyanarayana, T. [4 ]
Majumdar, K. [5 ]
Jat, R. D. [6 ]
Shivay, Y. S. [1 ]
Kumar, D. [1 ]
Ghasal, P. C. [7 ]
Singh, Kuldeep [8 ]
机构
[1] Indian Agr Res Inst IARI, ICAR, New Delhi 110012, India
[2] Indian Agr Stat Res Inst IASRI, ICAR, New Delhi 110012, India
[3] Indian Inst Maize Res IIMR, ICAR, PAU Campus, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India
[4] Int Plant Nutr Inst IPNI Ctr, New Delhi 110012, India
[5] African Plant Nutr Inst APNI, Benguerir 43150, Morocco
[6] Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agr Univ CCSHAU, Hisar 125004, Haryana, India
[7] Indian Inst Farming Syst Res IIFSR, ICAR, Meerut 250110, Uttar Pradesh, India
[8] Amity Univ Campus, Amity Ctr Soil Sci, Noida 201313, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Maize-mustard rotation; Zero tillage; Permanent bed; Nutrient management; Net returns; Soil biological properties; INDO-GANGETIC PLAINS; WHEAT CROPPING SYSTEM; ORGANIC-CARBON; BASMATI RICE; WATER PRODUCTIVITY; PENETRATION RESISTANCE; RESIDUE MANAGEMENT; MICROBIAL BIOMASS; TILLAGE; FERTILIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2020.108002
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Conservation agriculture (CA) is being advocated as an alternative to conventional tillage based systems, as it not only holds the potential to enhance soil biological properties, but could also sustain production in the long-run. The impact of long-term tillage and nutrient management on soil biological properties, crops performance, yield and returns were evaluated under maize-mustard rotation. Three tillage practices viz. zero tilled flatbed (ZTFB), permanent bed (PNB) and conventional tillage (CT) along with three nutrient management practices; farmer's fertilizer practices (FFP), recommended dose of fertilization (RDF) and nutrient expert assisted: site-specific nutrient management (NE (R)) were tested under the field conditions for six years (2013-2019). ZTFB produced the highest average maize grain yield, which was statistically similar to PNB; however it was 28.4% greater than CT. NE (R) and RDF recorded 27.4% and 24.8% higher yield over FFP, respectively. Similarly, ZTFB and PNB produced 8.0% greater mustard seed yield than CT, while NE (R) and RDF had 23.5% and 22.3% greater seed yield compared to FFP. Average of six years indicates, ZTFB and PNB produced 9.7% and 8.9% greater maize grain equivalent yield (MGEY) than CT. Furthermore, NE (R) and RDF had similar MGEY, but 24.9% and 23% greater than FFP. ZTFB and PNB gave the maximum economic benefits in comparison to CT plots. CT was 18.7% and 19.3% costlier than PNB and ZTFB, while RDF was more expensive than NE (R) and FFP. Plots under ZTFB and PNB had 13.9% and 17.8% (0.0-0.15 m soil profile) and 14.6% and 12.5% (0.16-0.30 m soil profile) greater soil organic carbon (SOC) than CT plots. These practices also had significant (p<0.05) positive impact on soil biological properties, such as, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC), dehydrogenase (DH), alkaline phosphatase (AP) and urease (UA) activities. In 0.0-0.15 m soil layer, NE (R) had greater values for SOC and SMBC than FFP, but not significantly different to RDF. This study clearly demonstrated that the adoption of conservation tillage (ZTFB / PNB) coupled with NE (R) and RDF in maize-mustard rotation would definitely improve system MGEY, net returns and soil biological properties in semi-arid regions of the north-west India.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Allen DE, 2011, SOIL BIOL, V29, P25, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-20256-8_2
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ANN PROGR REPORT KHA, P1082
[3]   Soil water retention as affected by tillage and residue management in semiarid Spain [J].
Bescansa, P ;
Imaz, MJ ;
Virto, I ;
Enrique, A ;
Hoogmoed, WB .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2006, 87 (01) :19-27
[4]  
Budhathoki S., 2018, ACTA SCI-AGRON, V2, P153, DOI DOI 10.31080/ASAG.2018.02.0160
[5]  
CASIDA L. E., 1964, SOIL SCI, V98, P371, DOI 10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004
[6]   Conservation agriculture in an irrigated cotton-wheat system of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains: Crop and water productivity and economic profitability [J].
Das, T. K. ;
Bhattacharyya, Ranjan ;
Sudhishri, S. ;
Sharma, A. R. ;
Saharawat, Y. S. ;
Bandyopadhyay, K. K. ;
Sepat, Seema ;
Bana, R. S. ;
Aggarwal, Pramila ;
Sharma, R. K. ;
Bhatia, A. ;
Singh, Geeta ;
Datta, S. P. ;
Kar, A. ;
Singh, Billu ;
Singh, Parmendra ;
Pathak, H. ;
Vyas, A. K. ;
Jat, M. L. .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2014, 158 :24-33
[7]   Impacts of conservation agriculture on total soil organic carbon retention potential under an irrigated agro-ecosystem of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains [J].
Das, T. K. ;
Bhattacharyya, Ranjan ;
Sharma, A. R. ;
Das, S. ;
Saad, A. A. ;
Pathak, H. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2013, 51 :34-42
[8]  
Devi S, 2017, OPEN AGRIC, V2, P486, DOI 10.1515/opag-2017-0053
[9]  
Dhull S., 2004, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, V50, P641, DOI DOI 10.1080/08927010400011294
[10]  
Gaire A., 2016, Int. J. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol, V4, P178, DOI [10.3126/ijasbt.v4i2.14974, DOI 10.3126/IJASBT.V4I2.14974]