Deriving Site-Specific Clean-Up Criteria to Protect Ecological Receptors (Plants and Soil Invertebrates) Exposed to Metal or Metalloid Soil Contaminants via the Direct Contact Exposure Pathway

被引:31
作者
Checkai, Ron
Van Genderen, Eric
Sousa, Jose Paulo
Stephenson, Gladys
Smolders, Erik
机构
[1] US Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Environmental Toxicology Branch, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
[2] International Zinc Association, Durham, NC
[3] IMAR-CMA, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra
[4] Guelph, ON
[5] Division Soil and Water Management, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven
关键词
NOEC TOXICITY DATA; RISK APPROACH; MOLYBDENUM; ACCOUNT; VALUES; COPPER; LIMITS; ZINC;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.1528
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Soil contaminant concentration limits for the protection of terrestrial plants and soil invertebrates are commonly based on thresholds derived using data from laboratory ecotoxicity tests. A comprehensive assessment has been made for the derivation of ecological soil screening levels (Eco-SSL) in the United States; however, these limits are conservative because of their focus on high bioavailability scenarios. Here, we explain and evaluate approaches to soil limit derivation taken by 4 jurisdictions, 2 of which allow for correction of data for factors affecting bioavailability among soils, and between spiked and field-contaminated soils (Registration Evaluation Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals [REACH] Regulation, European Union [EU], and the National Environment Protection Council [NEPC], Australia). Scientifically advanced features from these methods have been integrated into a newly developed method for deriving soil clean-up values (SCVs) within the context of site-specific baseline ecological risk assessment. Resulting site-specific SCVs that account for bioavailability may permit a greater residual concentration in soil when compared to generic screening limit concentrations (e.g., Eco-SSL), while still affording acceptable protection. Two choices for selecting the level of protection are compared (i.e., allowing higher effect levels per species, or allowing a higher percentile of species that are potentially unprotected). Implementation of this new method is presented for the jurisdiction of the United States, with a focus on metal and metalloid contaminants; however, the new method can be used in any jurisdiction. A case study for molybdate shows the large effect of bioavailability corrections and smaller effects of protection level choices when deriving SCVs. (C) 2014 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 357
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Alberta Environment, 2010, GUID PREP ENV IMP AS
[2]   CONFIDENCE-LIMITS FOR HAZARDOUS CONCENTRATIONS BASED ON LOGISTICALLY DISTRIBUTED NOEC TOXICITY DATA [J].
ALDENBERG, T ;
SLOB, W .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 1993, 25 (01) :48-63
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, EUR UN RISK ASS REP
[4]  
Arche, 2012, SOIL PNEC CALC
[5]  
[BC-MOE] British Columbia Ministry of Environment, 2006, DEV CAR ENV GUID URB
[6]  
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 2007, CAN ENV QUAL GUID
[7]  
CCME, 2006, PROT DER ENV HUM HLT
[8]   Evaluation of the Dutch environmental risk limits for metals by application of the added risk approach [J].
Crommentuijn, T ;
Polder, M ;
Sijm, D ;
de Bruijn, J ;
van de Plassche, E .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2000, 19 (06) :1692-1701
[9]   Maximum permissible and negligible concentrations for metals and metalloids in the Netherlands, taking into account background concentrations [J].
Crommentuijn, T ;
Sijm, D ;
de Bruijn, J ;
van den Hoop, M ;
van Leeuwen, K ;
van de Plassche, E .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2000, 60 (02) :121-143
[10]  
ECHA (European Chemicals Agency), 2008, Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment chapter R.10: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for environment