Hypothesis testing and Bayesian estimation using a sigmoid Emax model applied to sparse dose-response designs

被引:31
|
作者
Thomas, Neal [1 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Inc, Stat Res & Consulting Ctr, New London, CT 06230 USA
关键词
Bayes estimation; dose response; sigmoid E-max model; trend tests;
D O I
10.1080/10543400600860469
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Application of a sigmoid E-max model is described for the assessment of dose-response with designs containing a small number of doses (typically, three to six). The expanded model is a common E-max model with a power (Hill) parameter applied to dose and the ED50 parameter. The model will be evaluated following a strategy proposed by Bretz et al. (2005). The sigmoid E-max model is used to create several contrasts that have high power to detect an increasing trend from placebo. Alpha level for the hypothesis of no dose-response is controlled using multiple comparison methods applied to the p-values obtained from the contrasts. Subsequent to establishing drug activity, Bayesian methods are used to estimate the dose-response curve from the sparse dosing design. Bayesian estimation applied to the sigmoid model represents uncertainty in model selection that is missed when a single simpler model is selected from a collection of non-nested models. The goal is to base model selection on substantive knowledge and broad experience with dose-response relationships rather than criteria selected to ensure convergence of estimators. Bayesian estimation also addresses deficiencies in confidence intervals and tests derived from asymptotic-based maximum likelihood estimation when some parameters are poorly determined, which is typical for data from common dose-response designs.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 677
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bayesian Development of a Dose-Response Model for Aspergillus fumigatus and Invasive Aspergillosis
    Leleu, Christopher
    Menotti, Jean
    Meneceur, Pascale
    Choukri, Firas
    Sulahian, Annie
    Garin, Yves Jean-Francois
    Denis, Jean-Baptiste
    Derouin, Francis
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2013, 33 (08) : 1441 - 1453
  • [22] Algorithms for finding locally and Bayesian optimal designs for binary dose-response models with control mortality
    Smith, DM
    Ridout, MS
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2005, 133 (02) : 463 - 478
  • [23] DOSE-RESPONSE FUNCTIONS IN AQUATIC TOXICITY TESTING AND THE WEIBULL MODEL
    CHRISTENSEN, ER
    WATER RESEARCH, 1984, 18 (02) : 213 - 221
  • [24] Compound optimal designs for percentile estimation in dose-response models with restricted design intervals
    Biedermann, Stefanie
    Dette, Holger
    Zhu, Wei
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2007, 137 (12) : 3838 - 3847
  • [25] A Bayesian design and analysis for dose-response using informative prior information
    Smith, Michael K.
    Marshall, Scott
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2006, 16 (05) : 695 - 709
  • [26] Bayesian designs of phase II oncology trials to select maximum effective dose assuming monotonic dose-response relationship
    Beibei Guo
    Yisheng Li
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14
  • [27] Bayesian designs of phase II oncology trials to select maximum effective dose assuming monotonic dose-response relationship
    Guo, Beibei
    Li, Yisheng
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [28] Using machine learning to model dose-response relationships
    Linden, Ariel
    Yarnold, Paul R.
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 22 (06) : 856 - 863
  • [29] Benchmarking of a Bayesian single cell RNAseq differential gene expression test for dose-response study designs
    Nault, Rance
    Saha, Satabdi
    Bhattacharya, Sudin
    Dodson, Jack
    Sinha, Samiran
    Maiti, Tapabrata
    Zacharewski, Tim
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2022, 50 (08) : E48
  • [30] A Bayesian dose-response meta-analysis model: A simulations study and application
    Hamza, Tasnim
    Cipriani, Andrea
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    Egger, Matthias
    Orsini, Nicola
    Salanti, Georgia
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (05) : 1358 - 1372