Why prevention of repeat abortion is so challenging: psychosocial characteristics of women at risk

被引:15
作者
Leeners, Brigitte [1 ]
Bieli, Simone [2 ]
Huang, Dorothy [3 ]
Tschudin, Sibil [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Clin Reprod Endocrinol, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Fac Med, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Div Social Med & Psychosomat, Spitalstr 21, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Contraception; immigrants; repeat abortion; risk factors; termination of pregnancy; UNINTENDED PREGNANCY; CONTRACEPTIVE PRACTICES; SWISS REGION; TRENDS; TERMINATION; CARE; WORLDWIDE; REQUESTS;
D O I
10.1080/13625187.2016.1258053
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: Abortion rates have declined in recent decades; however, the rate of repeat abortion remains high. In order to identify keys to making efficient interventions against repeat abortion, our objectives were: to assess the percentage of repeat abortions in women opting for termination of pregnancy over a period of 1 year; to identify the risk factors for repeat abortion; and to assess the characteristics of women who opted for a further pregnancy termination despite having received standard post-abortion care. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional survey was carried out among 362 women who underwent pregnancy termination during a 1-year period. Women with and without repeat abortion were compared with regard to age, nationality, marital status, parity and use of contraception. In a subsample of 160 women who were available for follow-up over 4 years, those who underwent a further pregnancy termination during the observation period were also analysed qualitatively. Results: The rate of repeat abortion was 30.1% in the survey population. Age and immigrant status were identified as risk factors. The use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) was significantly higher after repeat abortion than after a first termination of pregnancy. Among women with repeat abortion in the follow-up group, those with psychological problems tended to discontinue contraception and those with partnership conflicts were prone to using unreliable contraceptive methods. Conclusion: Aside from promoting LARC methods, strategies to reduce repeat abortion should consider the psychosocial risk factors and characteristics of women at risk identified in this study. An interdisciplinary approach including social care and counselling would be the most appropriate means to enable this.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 44
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Addor V, 2003, SWISS MED WKLY, V133, P219
[2]   A blessing I can't afford: Factors underlying the paradox of happiness about unintended pregnancy [J].
Aiken, Abigail R. A. ;
Dillaway, Chloe ;
Mevs-Korff, Natasha .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2015, 132 :149-155
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, RATE LEGAL ABORTIONS
[4]   "Baby? Baby Not?": Exploring Women's Narratives About Ambivalence Towards an Unintended Pregnancy [J].
Askelson, Natoshia M. ;
Losch, Mary E. ;
Thomas, Lindsey J. ;
Reynolds, Julie C. .
WOMEN & HEALTH, 2015, 55 (07) :842-858
[5]   Contraceptive practice before and after termination of pregnancy:: a prospective study [J].
Bianchi-Demicheli, F ;
Perrin, E ;
Bianchi, PG ;
Dumont, P ;
Lüdicke, F ;
Campana, A .
CONTRACEPTION, 2003, 67 (02) :107-113
[6]   Adverse childhood experiences and repeat induced abortion [J].
Bleil, Maria E. ;
Adler, Nancy E. ;
Pasch, Lauri A. ;
Sternfeld, Barbara ;
Reijo-Pera, Renee A. ;
Cedars, Marcelle I. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 (02) :122.e1-122.e6
[7]  
Caillot O AM, 2016, J GYNECOL OBST BIO R, DOI [10.1016/flgyn.2016.03.014, DOI 10.1016/FLGYN.2016.03.014]
[8]  
Darroch J.E., 2011, Contraceptive Technologies: Responding to Women''s Needs
[9]   Trends in contraceptive need and use in developing countries in 2003, 2008, and 2012: an analysis of national surveys [J].
Darroch, Jacqueline E. ;
Singh, Susheela .
LANCET, 2013, 381 (9879) :1756-1762
[10]   Repeat abortion: facts and issues [J].
Das, Sangeeta ;
Adegbenro, Adewale ;
Ray, Susmita ;
Amu, Olubusola .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2009, 35 (02) :93-95