Importance of Magnetizing Field on Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal of Defects

被引:23
作者
Hong Quang Pham [1 ]
Quang Trung Trinh [1 ]
Duy Tuan Doan [1 ]
Quang Hung Tran [2 ]
机构
[1] PetroVietnam Univ, Fac Fundamental Sci, Baria 790000, Vietnam
[2] Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Inst Charles Gerhardt Montpellier, UMR 5253, F-34095 Montpellier, France
关键词
Magnetic flux leakage (MFL); magnetization; pipeline inspection; INSPECTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/TMAG.2018.2809671
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The measurement of magnetic flux leakage (MFL) is widely used as a non-destructive technique for inspecting oil and gas pipelines. In this method, many factors can affect the MFL signal, but the magnetization of the pipeline is a fundamental issue that bears consideration. We investigated the dependence of the MFL signal on the magnetizing state of pipeline samples with respect to both near-side and far-side defects by varying the number of permanent magnets in each pole of the U-core system, varying the distance between the two poles, varying the gap between the U-core system and the surface of the steel plates engineered from a gas pipeline, and varying the depth of the rectangular defects. By systematically controlling the magnetization of the samples, we observed novel behaviors of the MFL signals as a function of defect depth. For samples having above-saturated magnetization, the dependence of the MFL signal can be expressed as a quadratic function for all defect depths. However, for samples having below-saturated magnetization, the MFL signal increases linearly at low-defect depths, but exhibits a quadratic response at high-defect depths. These findings have relevance for both fundamental research and practical applications, and they provide a novel and precise cartography method for accurately quantifying the depth of defects in MFL measurement.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WELDED PIPE TUBE
[2]  
[Anonymous], P ASME 2009 PRESS VE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, THESIS
[4]  
ATHERTON DL, 1989, OIL GAS J, V87, P52
[5]  
Blitz J., 1997, NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALU, V3, P43
[6]  
Dobmann G., 1980, RES TECHNIQUES NONDE, P39
[7]   Dipole Modeling of Magnetic Flux Leakage [J].
Dutta, Sushant M. ;
Ghorbel, Fathi H. ;
Stanley, Roderic K. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2009, 45 (04) :1959-1965
[8]   Three-axis magnetic flux leakage in-line inspection simulation based on finite-element analysis [J].
Feng Jian ;
Zhang Jun-Feng ;
Lu Sen-Xiang ;
Wang Hong-Yang ;
Ma Rui-Ze .
CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2013, 22 (01)
[9]   NEW FINDINGS IN THE FIELD OF NONDESTRUCTIVE MAGNETIC LEAKAGE FIELD INSPECTION [J].
FORSTER, F .
NDT INTERNATIONAL, 1986, 19 (01) :3-14
[10]   Finite element modelling of magnet compression using coupled electromagnetic-structural codes [J].
Hainsworth, G ;
Leonard, PJ ;
Rodger, D .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1996, 32 (03) :1050-1053