Sustainability assessment of renewable power and heat generation technologies

被引:65
作者
Dombi, Mihaly [1 ]
Kuti, Istvan [1 ]
Balogh, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Debrecen, Ctr Agr & Appl Econ Sci, Fac Appl Econ & Rural Dev, Inst Econ Theory,Dept Gen & Environm Econ, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
[2] Univ Debrecen, Ctr Agr & Appl Econ Sci, Inst Econ Analyt Methodol & Appl Informat, Fac Appl Econ & Rural Dev,Dept Econ Analyt Method, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
关键词
Renewable energy sources; Electric power generation; Heat supply; Sustainability assessment; Choice experiment; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; OF-THE-ART; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; ENERGY-SOURCES; ELECTRICITY; CHOICE; PREFERENCE; VALUATION; ATTRIBUTES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.032
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Rationalisation of consumption, more efficient energy usage and a new energy structure are needed to be achieved in order to shift the structure of energy system towards sustainability. The required energy system is among others characterised by intensive utilisation of renewable energy sources (RES). RES technologies have their own advantages and disadvantages. Nevertheless, for the strategic planning there is a great demand for the comparison of RES technologies. Furthermore, there are additional functions of RES utilisation expected beyond climate change mitigation, e.g. increment of employment, economic growth and rural development. The aim of the study was to reveal the most beneficial RES technologies with special respect to sustainability. Ten technologies of power generation and seven technologies of heat supply were examined in a multi-criteria sustainability assessment frame of seven attributes which were evaluated based on a choice experiment (CE) survey. According to experts the most important characteristics of RES utilisation technologies are land demand and social impacts i.e. increase in employment and local income generation. Concentrated solar power (CSP), hydropower and geothermal power plants are favourable technologies for power generation, while geothermal district heating, pellet-based non-grid heating and solar thermal heating can offer significant advantages in case of heat supply. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 271
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
[51]   Generation and calibration of transit hyperpaths [J].
Schmoecker, Jan-Dirk ;
Shimamoto, Hiroshi ;
Kurauchi, Fumitaka .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, 36 :406-418
[52]   An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology [J].
Shen, Yung-Chi ;
Lin, Grace T. R. ;
Li, Kuang-Pin ;
Yuan, Benjamin J. C. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (08) :4604-4616
[53]   An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies [J].
Singh, Rajesh Kumar ;
Murty, H. R. ;
Gupta, S. K. ;
Dikshit, A. K. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2009, 9 (02) :189-212
[54]   Generating electricity with forest biomass: Consistency and payment timeframe effects in choice experiments [J].
Solino, Mario ;
Farizo, Begona A. ;
Vazquez, Maria X. ;
Prada, Albino .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 41 :798-806
[55]   Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity options for the UK [J].
Stamford, Laurence ;
Azapagic, Adisa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2012, 36 (14) :1263-1290
[56]   Estimation on stated-preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choices [J].
Train, Kenneth ;
Wilson, Wesley W. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2008, 42 (03) :191-203
[57]  
Tsagarakis K. P., 2013, 134 U AMST
[58]   Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies [J].
Tsoutsos, T ;
Frantzeskaki, N ;
Gekas, V .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (03) :289-296
[59]   Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete [J].
Tsoutsos, Theocharis ;
Drandaki, Maria ;
Frantzeskaki, Niki ;
Iosifidis, Eleftherios ;
Kiosses, Ioannis .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (05) :1587-1600
[60]   Assessing customer preferences for hydrogen-powered street sweepers: A choice experiment [J].
Walter, Stephan ;
Ulli-Beer, Silvia ;
Wokaun, Alexander .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (16) :12003-12014