Variable reliability of surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

被引:15
作者
Bojsen-Moller, Kirstine N. [1 ,2 ]
Dirksen, Carsten [1 ,2 ]
Svane, Maria S. [1 ,2 ]
Jorgensen, Nils B. [1 ,2 ]
Holst, Jens J. [2 ,3 ]
Richter, Erik A. [4 ]
Madsbad, Sten [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hvidovre Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Kettegaard Alle 30, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Novo Nordisk Fdn Ctr Basic Metab Res, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Biomed Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Sci, Dept Nutr Exercise & Sports Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
bariatric surgery; peripheral insulin sensitivity; hepatic insulin sensitivity; HOMA-IR; QUICKI; Matsuda; OGIS; BETA-CELL FUNCTION; HOMEOSTASIS MODEL ASSESSMENT; GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; POSTPRANDIAL HYPOGLYCEMIA; METABOLISM; SECRETION; INDEXES; RESISTANCE; SURGERY; MUSCLE;
D O I
10.1152/ajpregu.00291.2016
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) induces weight loss and improves insulin sensitivity when evaluated by the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HEC). Surrogate indices of insulin sensitivity calculated from insulin and glucose concentrations at fasting or after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) are frequently used, but have not been validated after RYGB. Our aim was to evaluate whether surrogate indices reliably estimate changes in insulin sensitivity after RYGB. Four fasting surrogates (inverse-HOMA-IR, HOMA2-%S, QUICKI, revised-QUICKI) and three OGTT-derived surrogates (Matsuda, Gutt, OGIS) were compared with HEC-estimated peripheral insulin sensitivity (R-d or R-d/I, depending on how the index was originally validated) and the tracer-determined hepatic insulin sensitivity index (HISI) in patients with preoperative type 2 diabetes (n = 10) and normal glucose tolerance (n = 10) 1 wk, 3 mo, and 1 yr postoperatively. Post-RYGB changes in inverse-HOMA-IR and HOMA2-%S did not correlate with changes in R-d at any visit, but were comparable to changes in HISI at 1 wk. Changes in QUICKI and revised-QUICKI correlated with R-d/I after surgery. Changes in the Matsuda and Gutt indices did not correlate with changes in R-d/I and R-d, respectively, whereas OGIS changes correlated with R-d changes at 1 yr post-RYGB. In conclusion, surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity may not reflect results obtained with gold standard methodology after RYGB, underscoring the importance of critical reflection when surrogate endpoints are used. Fasting surrogate indices may be particularly affected by post-RYGB changes in insulin clearance, whereas the validity of OGTT-derived surrogates may be compromised by surgical rearrangements of the gut.
引用
收藏
页码:R797 / R805
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [11] No Islet Cell Hyperfunction, but Altered Gut-Islet Regulation and Postprandial Hypoglycemia in Glucose-Tolerant Patients 3 Years After Gastric Bypass Surgery
    Dirksen, Carsten
    Eiken, Aleksander
    Bojsen-Moller, Kirstine N.
    Svane, Maria S.
    Martinussen, Christoffer
    Jorgensen, Nils B.
    Holst, Jens J.
    Madsbad, Sten
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2016, 26 (09) : 2263 - 2267
  • [12] Validation of the insulin sensitivity index (ISI0,120):: comparison with other measures
    Gutt, M
    Davis, CL
    Spitzer, SB
    Llabre, MM
    Kumar, M
    Czarnecki, EM
    Schneiderman, N
    Skyler, JS
    Marks, JB
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2000, 47 (03) : 177 - 184
  • [13] Effects of gastric bypass surgery on glucose absorption and metabolism during a mixed meal in glucose-tolerant individuals
    Jacobsen, Siv H.
    Bojsen-Moller, Kirstine N.
    Dirksen, Carsten
    Jorgensen, Nils B.
    Clausen, Trine R.
    Wulff, Birgitte S.
    Kristiansen, Viggo B.
    Worm, Dorte
    Hansen, Dorte L.
    Holst, Jens J.
    van Hall, Gerrit
    Madsbad, Sten
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2013, 56 (10) : 2250 - 2254
  • [14] Acute and long-term effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on glucose metabolism in subjects with Type 2 diabetes and normal glucose tolerance
    Jorgensen, N. B.
    Jacobsen, S. H.
    Dirksen, C.
    Bojsen-Moller, K. N.
    Naver, L.
    Hvolris, L.
    Clausen, T. R.
    Wulff, B. S.
    Worm, D.
    Hansen, D. Lindqvist
    Madsbad, S.
    Holst, J. J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2012, 303 (01): : E122 - E131
  • [15] Exaggerated Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Response Is Important for Improved β-Cell Function and Glucose Tolerance After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
    Jorgensen, Nils B.
    Dirksen, Carsten
    Bojsen-Moller, Kirstine N.
    Jacobsen, Siv H.
    Worm, Dorte
    Hansen, Dorte L.
    Kristiansen, Viggo B.
    Naver, Lars
    Madsbad, Sten
    Holst, Jens J.
    [J]. DIABETES, 2013, 62 (09) : 3044 - 3052
  • [16] Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: A simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans
    Katz, A
    Nambi, SS
    Mather, K
    Baron, AD
    Follmann, DA
    Sullivan, G
    Quon, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2000, 85 (07) : 2402 - 2410
  • [17] Insulin sensitivity assessment in uncomplicated obese women: comparison of indices from fasting and oral glucose load with euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp
    Leonetti, F
    Iacobellis, G
    Zappaterreno, A
    Ribaudo, MC
    Tiberti, C
    Vecci, E
    Di Mario, U
    [J]. NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2004, 14 (06) : 366 - 372
  • [18] Correct homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) evaluation uses the computer program
    Levy, JC
    Matthews, DR
    Hermans, MP
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (12) : 2191 - 2192
  • [19] Restoration of normal glucose tolerance in severely obese patients after bilio-pancreatic diversion: role of insulin sensitivity and beta cell function
    Mari, A.
    Manco, M.
    Guidone, C.
    Nanni, G.
    Castagneto, M.
    Mingrone, G.
    Ferrannini, E.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2006, 49 (09) : 2136 - 2143
  • [20] Comparative evaluation of simple insulin sensitivity methods based on the oral glucose tolerance test
    Mari, A
    Pacini, G
    Brazzale, AR
    Ahrén, B
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2005, 48 (04) : 748 - 751