Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness

被引:209
作者
Hornsey, Matthew J. [1 ]
Blackwood, Leda
Louis, Winnifred
Fielding, Kelly
Mavor, Ken
Morton, Thomas
O'Brien, Anne
Paasonen, Karl-Erik
Smith, Joanne
White, Katherine M.
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QJ, Devon, England
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00077.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research has shown limited support for the notion that perceived effectiveness of collective action is a predictor of intentions to engage in collective action. One reason may be that effectiveness has been in terms of whether the action will influence key decision makers. We argue that the effectiveness of collective action might be judged by other criteria, such as whether it influences third parties, builds an oppositional movement, and expresses values. Two hundred and thirty one attendees at a rally rated the effectiveness of the rally and their intentions to engage in future collective action. For those participants who were not members of an organization, intentions were linked to the perceived effectiveness of the rally in expressing values and influencing the public. For those who were members of an organization, intentions were linked only to the effectiveness of the rally in building an oppositional movement.
引用
收藏
页码:1701 / 1722
页数:22
相关论文
共 46 条
[11]   ISSUE SALIENCE, PERCEIVED EFFICACY AND PERCEIVED RISK - A STUDY OF THE ORIGINS OF ANTI-NUCLEAR WAR ACTIVITY [J].
FOX, DL ;
SCHOFIELD, JW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 19 (10) :805-827
[12]   IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER - ACCOUNTING FOR VARIABILITY IN ATTITUDES AND COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE REACTIONS TOWARD THE THREAT OF NUCLEAR-WAR [J].
HAMILTON, SB ;
KNOX, TA ;
KEILIN, WG ;
CHAVEZ, EL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 17 (11) :927-952
[14]  
Hogg M.A., 1988, SOCIAL IDENTIFICATIO
[15]   Speaking for others: The pros and cons of group advocates using collective language [J].
Hornsey, MJ ;
Blackwood, L ;
O'Brien, A .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2005, 8 (03) :245-257
[16]   On being loud and proud: Non-conformity and counter-conformity to group norms [J].
Hornsey, MJ ;
Majkut, L ;
Terry, DJ ;
McKimmie, BM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 42 :319-335
[17]   THE FUNCTIONAL-APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES [J].
KATZ, D .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1960, 24 (02) :163-204
[18]   ATTITUDES, INTENTIONS, AND BEHAVIOR - A STUDY OF WOMENS PARTICIPATION IN COLLECTIVE ACTION [J].
KELLY, C ;
BREINLINGER, S .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 25 (16) :1430-1445
[19]   IDENTITY AND INJUSTICE - EXPLORING WOMENS PARTICIPATION IN COLLECTIVE ACTION [J].
KELLY, C ;
BREINLINGER, S .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 5 (01) :41-57
[20]  
Kinder D. R., 1998, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL, P778