A Method for Solving Large-Scale Multiloop Constrained Dynamical Systems Using Structural Decomposition

被引:1
|
作者
Xiong, Tao [1 ]
Ding, Jianwan [1 ]
Wu, Yizhong [1 ]
Chen, Liping [1 ]
Hou, Wenjie [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Sci & Engn, Natl Engn Res Ctr CAD Software Informat Technol, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Eaton China Investments Co Ltd, Shanghai 200335, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS | 2017年 / 12卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
decomposition; DAEs; simulation efficiency; topology; multiloop; DIFFERENTIAL-ALGEBRAIC EQUATIONS; IMPROVED NUMERICAL DISSIPATION; TIME INTEGRATION ALGORITHM; MULTIBODY DYNAMICS; REDUCTION; SIMULATION; MOTION; ORDER;
D O I
10.1115/1.4034044
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
A structural decomposition method based on symbol operation for solving differential algebraic equations (DAEs) is developed. Constrained dynamical systems are represented in terms of DAEs. State-space methods are universal for solving DAEs in general forms, but for complex systems with multiple degrees-of-freedom, these methods will become difficult and time consuming because they involve detecting Jacobian singularities and reselecting the state variables. Therefore, we adopted a strategy of dividing and conquering. A large-scale system with multiple degrees-of-freedom can be divided into several subsystems based on the topology. Next, the problem of selecting all of the state variables from the whole system can be transformed into selecting one or several from each subsystem successively. At the same time, Jacobian singularities can also be easily detected in each subsystem. To decompose the original dynamical system completely, as the algebraic constraint equations are underdetermined, we proposed a principle of minimum variable reference degree to achieve the bipartite matching. Subsequently, the subsystems are determined by aggregating the strongly connected components in the algebraic constraint equations. After that determination, the free variables remain; therefore, a merging algorithm is proposed to allocate these variables into each subsystem optimally. Several examples are given to show that the proposed method is not only easy to implement but also efficient.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Subspace like Identification method for Large-scale LTI Dynamical Systems
    Sinquin, Baptiste
    Verhaegen, Michel
    2017 SIGNAL PROCESSING SYMPOSIUM (SPSYMPO), 2017,
  • [22] Decomposition of Large-scale Constrained Problems Using a Genetic-based Search
    Aguilar-Justo, Adan E.
    Mezura-Montes, Efren
    Elsayed, Saber M.
    Sarker, Ruhul A.
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL AUTUMN MEETING ON POWER, ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTING (ROPEC), 2016,
  • [23] Large-scale structural analysis using domain decomposition method on distributed parallel computing environment
    Kim, SJ
    Kim, JH
    HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING ON THE INFORMATION SUPERHIGHWAY - HPC ASIA '97, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 573 - 578
  • [25] Impulsive stabilization of large-scale dynamical systems
    Yang, Zhichun
    Xu, Daoyi
    DYNAMIC SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, 2006, 15 (3-4): : 317 - 332
  • [26] Model reduction of large-scale dynamical systems
    Antoulas, A
    Sorensen, D
    Gallivan, KA
    Van Dooren, P
    Grama, A
    Hoffmann, C
    Sameh, A
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2004, PT 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3038 : 740 - 747
  • [27] ITERATIVE METHOD FOR PLANNING STRUCTURAL GROWTH OF LARGE-SCALE SYSTEMS
    AKINFIEV, VK
    KAPRANOV, MM
    TSVIRKUN, AD
    AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 1985, 46 (08) : 986 - 993
  • [28] Project and Forget: Solving Large-Scale Metric Constrained Problems
    Sonthalia, Rishi
    Gilbert, Anna C.
    Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2022, 23
  • [29] Solving LP Relaxations of Large-Scale Precedence Constrained Problems
    Bienstock, Daniel
    Zuckerberg, Mark
    INTEGER PROGRAMMING AND COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 6080 : 1 - +
  • [30] A GENERALIZED STRUCTURAL DOMINANCE METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF LARGE-SCALE SYSTEMS
    BONVIN, D
    MELLICHAMP, DA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1982, 35 (05) : 807 - 827