Type 2 diabetes and cancer: umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies

被引:631
作者
Tsilidis, Konstantinos K. [1 ,2 ]
Kasimis, John C. [1 ]
Lopez, David S. [3 ]
Ntzani, Evangelia E. [1 ]
Ioannidis, John P. A. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ioannina, Sch Med, Dept Hyg & Epidemiol, GR-45110 Ioannina, Greece
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, England
[3] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford Prevent Res Ctr, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Sch Humanities & Sci, Dept Stat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2015年 / 350卷
关键词
PUBLICATION BIAS; INCREASED RISK; INTRAHEPATIC CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; GASTRIC-CANCER; MELLITUS; MORTALITY; EXCESS; HETEROGENEITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ASSOCIATIONS;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.g7607
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To summarise the evidence and evaluate the validity of the associations between type 2 diabetes and the risk of developing or dying from cancer. Design An umbrella review of the evidence across meta-analyses of observational studies of type 2 diabetes with risk of developing or dying from any cancer. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, and manual screening of references. Eligibility criteria Meta-analyses or systematic reviews of observational studies in humans that examined the association between type 2 diabetes and risk of developing or dying from cancer. Results Eligible meta-analyses assessed associations between type 2 diabetes and risk of developing cancer in 20 sites and mortality for seven cancer sites. The summary random effects estimates were significant at P=0.05 in 20 meta-analyses (74%); and all reported increased risks of developing cancer for participants with versus without diabetes. Of the 27 meta-analyses, eventually only seven (26%) compiled evidence on more than 1000 cases, had significant summary associations at P=0.001 for both random and fixed effects calculations, and had neither evidence of small study effects nor evidence for excess significance. Of those, only six (22%) did not have substantial heterogeneity (I-2>75%), pertaining to associations between type 2 diabetes and risk of developing breast, cholangiocarcinoma (both intrahepatic and extrahepatic), colorectal, endometrial, and gallbladder cancer. The 95% prediction intervals excluded the null value for four of these associations (breast, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, colorectal, and endometrial cancer). Conclusions Though type 2 diabetes has been extensively studied in relation to risk of developing cancer and cancer mortality and strong claims of significance exist for most of the studied associations, only a minority of these associations have robust supporting evidence without hints of bias.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DIABETES ATLAS, V6th
[2]   Type 2 diabetes and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies [J].
Bansal, D. ;
Bhansali, A. ;
Kapil, G. ;
Undela, K. ;
Tiwari, P. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2013, 16 (02) :151-158
[3]   Diabetes mellitus and incidence and mortality of kidney cancer: A meta-analysis [J].
Bao, Cuiping ;
Yang, Xilin ;
Xu, Weili ;
Luo, Hongbin ;
Xu, Zhongliang ;
Su, Cheng ;
Qi, Xiuying .
JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2013, 27 (04) :357-364
[4]   Long-term All-Cause Mortality in Cancer Patients With Preexisting Diabetes Mellitus A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Barone, Bethany B. ;
Yeh, Hsin-Chieh ;
Snyder, Claire F. ;
Peairs, Kimberly S. ;
Stein, Kelly B. ;
Derr, Rachel L. ;
Wolff, Antonio C. ;
Brancati, Frederick L. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 300 (23) :2754-2764
[5]   Diabetes mellitus and risk of pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of cohort studies [J].
Ben, Qiwen ;
Xu, Maojin ;
Ning, Xiaoyan ;
Liu, Jun ;
Hong, Shangyou ;
Huang, Wen ;
Zhang, Huagao ;
Li, Zhaoshen .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 (13) :1928-1937
[6]   False-positive results in cancer epidemiology: A plea for epistemological modesty [J].
Boffetta, Paolo ;
McLaughlin, Joseph K. ;
La Vecchia, Carlo ;
Tarone, Robert E. ;
Lipworth, Loren ;
Blot, William J. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (14) :988-995
[7]   Increased incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, leukemia, and myeloma in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2: a meta-analysis of observational studies [J].
Castillo, Jorge J. ;
Mull, Nikhil ;
Reagan, John L. ;
Nemr, Saed ;
Mitri, Joanna .
BLOOD, 2012, 119 (21) :4845-4850
[8]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[9]   Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias [J].
Dwan, Kerry ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Arnaiz, Juan A. ;
Bloom, Jill ;
Chan, An-Wen ;
Cronin, Eugenia ;
Decullier, Evelyne ;
Easterbrook, Philippa J. ;
Von Elm, Erik ;
Gamble, Carrol ;
Ghersi, Davina ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Simes, John ;
Williamson, Paula R. .
PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (08)
[10]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634