Sonographic fetal weight estimation - is there more to it than just fetal measurements?

被引:38
作者
Barel, Oshri [1 ,2 ]
Maymon, Ron [1 ,2 ]
Vaknin, Zvi [1 ,2 ]
Tovbin, Josef [1 ,2 ]
Smorgick, Noam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Assaf Harofeh Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-70300 Zerifin, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUME; BIRTH-WEIGHT; ACCURACY; CHARTS; SIZE; FORMULAS; FETUSES; MODEL; BODY; HEAD;
D O I
10.1002/pd.4250
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different maternal, fetal, and examiner related factors on the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation (SFWE). MethodsA retrospective cohort study analyzing 9064 SFWEs performed within 1week prior to delivery, including singleton pregnancies with a gestational age of 37 to 42weeks, was recorded at one medical center from January 2004 to September 2011. Predicted birth weights were calculated according to models by Sabbagha et al., Hadlock et al., and Combs et al. and were compared with the actual birth weight. Effects of different factors on SFWE accuracy were assessed. The systematic error, random error, and mean absolute percentage error were used as measures of accuracy. ResultsHigh maternal weight, height, body mass index, multiparity, older maternal age, diabetes, and fetal male sex were associated with underestimation of SFWE (P<0.05). Fetal presentation and the sonographer's experience influenced SFWE differently using various models. The amniotic fluid index did have a significant effect on SFWE. Overall, more than 90% of the systematic errors were unaccounted for in the factors we assessed. ConclusionsMany maternal and fetal factors significantly influence the SFWE; nevertheless, most errors are probably due to inherent problems in SFWE formulas. (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 55
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Assessment of the accuracy of multiple sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas: A 10-year experience from a single center [J].
Maymon, R. (maymonrb@bezeqint.net), 1600, John Wiley and Sons Ltd (32) :815-823
[2]   The long-term outcome of retarded fetal growth [J].
Barker, DJP .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 40 (04) :853-863
[3]   Effect of Ob/Gyn residents' fatigue and training level on the accuracy of fetal weight estimation [J].
Ben-Aroya, Z ;
Segal, D ;
Hadar, A ;
Hallak, M ;
Friger, M ;
Katz, M ;
Mazor, M .
FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2002, 17 (03) :177-181
[4]   SONOGRAPHICALLY ESTIMATED FETAL WEIGHTS - ACCURACY AND LIMITATION [J].
BENACERRAF, BR ;
GELMAN, R ;
FRIGOLETTO, FD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 159 (05) :1118-1121
[5]   Estimation of fetal weight before and after amniotomy in the laboring gravid woman [J].
Blann, DW ;
Prien, SD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (05) :1117-1120
[6]   CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .3. ABDOMINAL MEASUREMENTS [J].
CHITTY, LS ;
ALTMAN, DG ;
HENDERSON, A ;
CAMPBELL, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (02) :125-131
[7]   CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .4. FEMUR LENGTH [J].
CHITTY, LS ;
ALTMAN, DG ;
HENDERSON, A ;
CAMPBELL, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (02) :132-135
[8]   CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .2. HEAD MEASUREMENTS [J].
CHITTY, LS ;
ALTMAN, DG ;
HENDERSON, T ;
CAMPBELL, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (01) :35-43
[9]  
COMBS CA, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P365
[10]   Sonographic weight estimation in fetuses with breech presentation [J].
Dammer, U. ;
Goecke, T. W. ;
Voigt, F. ;
Schmid, M. ;
Mayr, A. ;
Schild, R. L. ;
Beckmann, M. W. ;
Faschingbauer, F. .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2013, 287 (05) :851-858