STATES OF THE MIDDLE EAST IN SEARCH OF FOREIGN POLICY IDENTITY (Turkish, Iranian and Saudi Models)

被引:1
作者
Zvyagelskaya, Irina D. [1 ]
Kozhanov, Nikoli A. [1 ,2 ]
Svistunova, Irina A. [1 ]
Surkov, Nikolai Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci IMEMO, Primakov Natl Res Inst World Econ & Int Relat, 23 Profsoyuznaya Str, Moscow 117997, Russia
[2] European Univ St Petersburg, 6-1 Gagarinskaya Str, St Petersburg 191187, Russia
来源
MIROVAYA EKONOMIKA I MEZHDUNARODNYE OTNOSHENIYA | 2019年 / 63卷 / 09期
关键词
foreign policy; self-positioning; Turkey; Iran; Saudi Arabia; foreign policy identity;
D O I
10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-9-93-103
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
In the Middle East, the formation of nation-states has not been completed, and a search for foreign policy identity is still underway. The article examines the roots and evolution of foreign policy identity in three major Middle East states Turkey, Iran and Saudi Arabia. The authors analyze interaction between the national identities and foreign policy in different cultural contexts and under different political regimes. Turkey, which recalls its Ottoman past, is rapidly returning to the Middle East, challenging other players. Polls demonstrate that a growing share of the Turkish society is confident that Turkey can play an important role in the modern world, serve as a "model" for other states and act independently in the international arena. Tehran is actively pursuing a policy of regional expansion, relying on Shia communities and on its military might, which can eventually lead to a regional hegemony. This policy is based on several identities - revolutionary, pragmatist and pan-Iranian, which do not contradict and even complement each other. Saudi Arabia in the 21st century is positioning itself not only as a leader of the global Muslim, especially Sunni, community, but is also increasingly behaving as a hegemon of the Arab world countering the Iranian expansion. Despite all modernization efforts, the foreign policy identity of the Kingdom is strongly influenced by the tribal mentality of its ruling elite. The research demonstrates that in the Middle East states, foreign policy is strongly influenced by informal institutions - be it a western-type republic, a theocracy or an absolute monarchy. Hence customs, traditions, historical memory have a substantial impact on how the elites and general public envision the role of these countries and that of their rivals.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 103
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   State Identity in Iranian Foreign Policy [J].
Akbarzadeh, Shahram ;
Barry, James .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES, 2016, 43 (04) :613-629
[2]   SAUDI ARABIA'S FOREIGN POLICY [J].
Al Saud, Turki Al Faisal bin Abdul Aziz .
MIDDLE EAST POLICY, 2013, 20 (04) :37-44
[3]  
Al-e Akhmad Dzh, 1962, WESTOXIFICATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Al-Monitor
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, TURKIYE AFRIKANIN SE
[6]  
Aydin Mustafa, 2018, TURK DIS POLITIKASI
[7]  
Bin-Salman bin-Abdulaziz Mohammed, OUR VISION SAUDI ARA
[8]  
Cavusoglu M., 2019, 2019 YILINA GIRERKEN
[9]  
Chugrov SV, 2007, POLIS, P46
[10]  
Davutoglu A., 2010, Stratejik Derinlik: Turkiye'nin Uluslararasi Konumu, Kure Yayinlari