The design and management of multi-stakeholder research networks to maximize knowledge mobilization and innovation opportunities in the forest sector

被引:29
作者
Klenk, Nicole Lisa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wyatt, Stephen [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys, Scarborough, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Environm Sci, Scarborough, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Polit Sci, Scarborough, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
[4] Univ Moncton, Fac Foresterie, Edmundston, NB E3V 2S8, Canada
关键词
Research network governance; Science-policy interface; Network competence skills; Research utilization; Knowledge systems; SCIENCE-POLICY INTERFACE; ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; RIU MODEL; EUROPE; COMMUNICATION; UNIVERSITIES; TRANSLATION; SCIENTISTS; CHALLENGES; LINKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2015.06.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Our comparative analysis of forest research networks indicates the emergence and strengthening of a new model of knowledge co-production involving knowledge producers and users, with the goal of fostering innovation and addressing challenges facing the forest sector. However, effective movement towards this model requires attention to design and to management particularly in relation to the expectations of partners (both university and non-university) who are used to traditional models of knowledge production and linear processes of knowledge extension. Based on our survey and literature review, we argue that in the short-term, the objective of producing applied research requires that forest research networks prioritize diverse and tailored knowledge mobilization strategies, rather than emphasizing knowledge production. With regards to the longer-term objective of facilitating new avenues for innovation in the forest sector this requires a knowledge mobilization strategy that entails a level of engagement with partners that is creative and transformative rather than mainly informative. Building an organizational culture of innovation requires a different approach to producing applied research, although many of the same skills are required. Our analysis suggest that if networks are to be effective in both these short and long term objectives, they should foster openness by establishing transparent and responsive organizational processes. Although such policies may exist and be available to partners, we found relatively little information available on the processes of transparency, accountability and conflict resolution within the websites of the networks we compared. Establishing clear roles and consistent channels of communications is imperative to facilitate the efficient and effective management of the network and manage partners' expectations, regardless of the partnership model. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 86
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   The challenge of managing boundary-spanning research activities: Experiences from the Swedish context [J].
Adler, Niclas ;
Elmquist, Maria ;
Norrgren, Flemming .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (07) :1136-1149
[2]   New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of university research in government agencies [J].
Amara, N ;
Ouimet, M ;
Landry, R .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2004, 26 (01) :75-106
[3]  
[Anonymous], REPORT MAPPING CHARA
[4]   How do collaborations with universities affect firms' innovative performance? The role of "Pasteur scientists" in the advanced materials field [J].
Baba, Yasunori ;
Shichijo, Naohiro ;
Sedita, Silvia Rita .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (05) :756-764
[5]   Ontario's Forestry Research Partnership: Progress and next steps [J].
Baker, James A. ;
Bell, F. Wayne ;
Stinson, Al .
FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2008, 84 (05) :756-763
[6]  
Barry A, 2013, CULT ECON SOC, P1
[7]  
Bennet A., 2007, KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATI
[8]   The RIU model as an analytical framework for scientific knowledge transfer: the case of the "decision support system forest and climate change" [J].
Boecher, Michael ;
Krott, Max .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2014, 23 (14) :3641-3656
[9]   Determinants of integrated product development diffusion [J].
Boyle, T ;
Kumar, V ;
Kumar, U .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2006, 36 (01) :37-54
[10]  
Bozeman C., 2014, SPRINGERBRIEFS ENTRE