Comparison of the Shack-Hartmann and plenoptic sensor in closed-loop adaptive optics system

被引:9
作者
Jiang, Pengzhi [1 ]
Xu, Jieping [1 ]
Liang, Yonghui [1 ]
Mao, Hongjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Optoelect Sci & Engn, Dept Optoelect Engn, 109 Deya Rd, Changsha 410073, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
adaptive optics; wavefront sensing; Shack-Hartmann sensor; plenoptic sensor; WAVE-FRONT SENSOR;
D O I
10.1117/1.OE.55.3.033105
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
The wavefront sensor is used in adaptive optics (AO) to detect the atmospheric distortion, which feeds back to the deformable mirror to compensate for this distortion. While the Shack-Hartmann sensor has been widely used, the plenoptic sensor was proposed in recent years. The two different wavefront sensing methods have different interpretations and numerical consequences, though they are both slope-based. The plenoptic sensor is compared with the Shack-Hartmann sensor in a closed-loop AO system. Simulations are performed to investigate their performances under closed-loop conditions. The plenoptic sensors both without and with modulation are discussed. The results show that the closed-loop performance of the plenoptic sensor without modulation is worse than that of the Shack-Hartmann sensor when the star for observation is brighter than magnitude 7, but better when the star is fainter. The closed-loop performance of the plenoptic sensor could be improved by modulation, except for the faint star. In summary, the limiting magnitude of the astronomical AO system may be improved by using the plenoptic sensor instead of the Shack-Hartmann sensor, and the modulation of the plenoptic sensor is more suitable for the bright star. (C) 2016 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Bailey D. G., 2003, IMAGE VISION COMPUTI
[2]  
BOYER C, 1990, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1237, P406, DOI 10.1117/12.19313
[3]   Modelling astronomical adaptive optics - I. The software package CAOS [J].
Carbillet, M ;
Verinaud, C ;
Femenia, B ;
Riccardi, A ;
Fini, L .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 356 (04) :1263-1275
[4]   A comparison of the Shack-Hartmann and pyramid wavefront sensors [J].
Chew, Theam Yong ;
Clare, Richard M. ;
Lane, Richard G. .
OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2006, 268 (02) :189-195
[5]   Wave-front sensing from subdivision of the focal plane with a lenslet array [J].
Clare, RM ;
Lane, RG .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2005, 22 (01) :117-125
[6]   The AOLI low-order non-linear curvature wavefront sensor: a method for high sensitivity wavefront reconstruction [J].
Crass, Jonathan ;
Aisher, Peter ;
Femenia, Bruno ;
King, David L. ;
Mackay, Craig D. ;
Rebolo-Lopez, Rafael ;
Labadie, Lucas ;
Perez Garrido, Antonio ;
Balcells, Marc ;
Diaz Sanchez, Anastasio ;
Jimenez Fuensalida, Jesus ;
Lopez, Roberto L. ;
Oscoz, Alejandro ;
Perez Prieto, Jorge A. ;
Rodriguez-Ramos, Luis F. ;
Villo, Isidro .
ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS III, 2012, 8447
[7]   Using a Plenoptic Camera to Measure Distortions in Wavefronts Affected by Atmospheric Turbulence [J].
Eslami, Mohammed ;
Wu, Chensheng ;
Rzasa, John ;
Davis, Christopher C. .
LASER COMMUNICATION AND PROPAGATION THROUGH THE ATMOSPHERE AND OCEANS, 2012, 8517
[8]   Pyramid Wavefront Sensor behavior in partial correction Adaptive Optic systems [J].
Esposito, S ;
Riccardi, A .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2001, 369 (02) :L9-L12
[9]  
Hardy J. W., 1998, ADAPTIVE OPTICS ASTR
[10]  
JIANG WH, 1991, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1542, P130, DOI 10.1117/12.48800