Differences between screening sites in a glaucoma screening program

被引:7
作者
Ellish, NJ [1 ]
Higginbotham, EJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
vision screening; glaucoma screening; risk factors; screening programs;
D O I
10.1076/opep.9.4.225.1510
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To determine the differences in demographic variables, glaucoma risk factors, and visual acuity by type of screening site. METHODS We conducted glaucoma screenings throughout the city of Baltimore. A questionnaire collected information about age, race, and risk factors: having a relative with glaucoma, having diabetes, having a past eye injury or surgery, and not having an eye examination within two years. We also tested visual acuity and visual fields. We categorized screening sites into work places, senior centers, health fairs, and church groups, and created age-race groups by combining age and race categories. RESULTS This study is based on 1,366 people screened at 42 different sites. The majority of people screened were African-American (65%) and female (58%), with a mean age of 48 years. We found significant age and race differences between the screening sites. After stratifying by age-race groups, we found statistically significant associations between screening sites and not having a recent eye examination (P = .009) and visual acuity (P = .001). Health fairs had the largest percentage of people not having a recent eye examination, and senior centers had the largest percentage of people with poor visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS Our data showed differences in age and race between screening sites. After conducting stratified analysis, differences between screening sites and recent eye examinations and visual acuity persisted. These differences in screening sites, as well as objectives of the vision screening, should be considered when planning a screening program to help focus the program on appropriate high-risk subgroups of the population.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 237
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HLTH PEOPL 2010, V2nd
[2]   Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice [J].
Burnstein, Y ;
Ellish, NJ ;
Magbalon, M ;
Higginbotham, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 129 (03) :328-333
[3]  
COHEN RA, 1997, VITAL HLTH STAT, V10
[4]   THE VALUE OF SCREENING FOR GLAUCOMA WITH TONOMETRY [J].
EDDY, DM ;
SANDERS, LE ;
EDDY, JF .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1983, 28 (03) :194-205
[5]   Aging versus disease: The opinions of older black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white Americans about the causes and treatment of common medical conditions [J].
Goodwin, JS ;
Black, SA ;
Satish, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1999, 47 (08) :973-979
[6]  
HATCH SW, 1998, OPHTHALMIC RES EPIDE, P193
[7]   RISK-FACTORS FOR PRIMARY OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA [J].
KATZ, J ;
SOMMER, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1988, 4 (02) :110-114
[8]   THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA - A REVIEW [J].
LESKE, MC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1983, 118 (02) :166-191
[9]  
*NAT ADV EYE COUC, NIH PUBL
[10]   Eye care utilization by older Americans -: The SEE project [J].
Orr, P ;
Barrón, Y ;
Schein, OD ;
Rubin, GS ;
West, SK .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (05) :904-909