Cost-effectiveness analyses using real-world data: an overview of the literature

被引:38
作者
Bowrin, Kevin [1 ]
Briere, Jean-Baptiste [2 ]
Levy, Pierre [3 ]
Millier, Aurelie [4 ]
Clay, Emilie [4 ]
Toumi, Mondher [5 ]
机构
[1] Bayer Plc, 400 South Oak Way, Reading RG2 6AD, Berks, England
[2] Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
[3] PSL Res Univ, Univ Paris Dauphine, Paris, France
[4] Creativ Ceutical, Paris, France
[5] Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
关键词
Economic evaluation; modeling; real-world; literature review; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; REIMBURSEMENT; GUIDELINES; INCLUSION; DECISIONS; EFFICACY; REGISTRY; PAYMENT; DRUGS;
D O I
10.1080/13696998.2019.1588737
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Real-world evidence (RWE) may provide good estimates of absolute event probabilities and costs in patients in actual clinical practice, but their use in decision-analytic models poses many challenges. A literature review based on a systematic search was conducted to summarize the limitations of using RWE in decision-analytic modeling reported in the literature, but also to identify existing recommendations about real-world modeling.Methods: A literature search was performed on Medline and Embase databases, as well as relevant websites. No restrictions in language or geographical scope were imposed.Results: A total of 14 references were included. RWE is recognized as a valuable source of data for market access and reimbursement, and as a complement to clinical trial evidence for treatment pathways, resource use, long-term natural history, and effectiveness. The main limitations identified in the literature were: confounding bias, missing data, lack of accurate data related to drug exposure and outcomes, errors during the record-keeping process, protection of private data, and insufficient numbers of patients. Although most submission guidelines recognized the potential biases associated with RWE, guidance on the appropriate methods to deal with these biases, and approaches to review different relevant evidence to inform model development, were scarce. Several initiatives have attempted to provide guidance on the use of RWE in decision-modeling.Conclusions: RWE is likely to be particularly valuable for informing healthcare policy-makers when formulating appropriate treatment pathways, encouraging the optimal allocation of scarce resources, and improving aggregate patient outcomes. However, little guidance is available on the relative merits of using efficacy and/or effectiveness evidence in Health Technology Appraisal submissions. Further research is needed to better understand these methods and their potential applications in a broader range of scenarios and simulation studies, and their impact on economic modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 553
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Conducting cost-effectiveness analyses of type 2 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: can locally generated observational study data overcome methodological limitations? [J].
Baik, SeiHyun ;
Chacra, Antonio Roberto ;
Li Yuxiu ;
White, Jeremy ;
Gueler, Serdar ;
Latif, Zafar A. .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 88 :S17-S22
[2]   A Practical Guide for Using Registry Data to Inform Decisions About the Cost Effectiveness of New Cancer Drugs: Lessons Learned from the PHAROS Registry [J].
Blommestein, Hedwig M. ;
Franken, Margreet G. ;
Uyl-de Groot, Carin A. .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2015, 33 (06) :551-560
[3]  
Campbell Jonathan D, 2014, Ann Am Thorac Soc, V11 Suppl 2, pS105, DOI 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201309-295RM
[4]   Linking payment to health outcomes: A taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers [J].
Carlson, Josh J. ;
Sullivan, Sean D. ;
Garrison, Louis P. ;
Neumann, Peter J. ;
Veenstra, David L. .
HEALTH POLICY, 2010, 96 (03) :179-190
[5]   A Real-world Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Sevelamer Versus Calcium Acetate in Korean Dialysis Patients [J].
Cho, Jang-Hee ;
Jang, Hye Min ;
Jung, Hee-Yeon ;
Choi, Ji-Young ;
Park, Sun-Hee ;
Kim, Chan-Duck ;
Yang, Chul Woo ;
Jin, Dong-Chan ;
Kim, Yong-Lim .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 40 (01) :123-134
[6]  
Dahabreh IJ, 2017, AHRQ METHODS EFFECTI
[7]   The future of pharmacoeconomics: Bridging science and practice [J].
Drummond, MF .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1996, 18 (05) :969-978
[8]  
Drummond MF., 2005, Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, V3rd, P379
[9]  
Eichler HG, 2011, NAT REV DRUG DISCOV, V10, P495, DOI [10.1038/nrd3348, 10.1038/nrd3501]
[10]   Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: The ISPOR real-world data task force report [J].
Garrison, Louis P., Jr. ;
Neumann, Peter J. ;
Erickson, Pennifer ;
Marshall, Deborah ;
Mullins, Daniel .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (05) :326-335