From Code to Bedside: Implementing Artificial Intelligence Using Quality Improvement Methods

被引:28
作者
Smith, Margaret [1 ]
Sattler, Amelia [1 ]
Hong, Grace [1 ]
Lin, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Div Primary Care & Populat Hlth, Stanford Healthcare AI Appl Res Team,Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; quality improvement; design thinking; implementation science; HEALTH-CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-020-06394-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite increasing interest in how artificial intelligence (AI) can augment and improve healthcare delivery, the development of new AI models continues to outpace adoption in existing healthcare processes. Integration is difficult because current approaches separate the development of AI models from the complex healthcare environments in which they are intended to function, resulting in models developed without a clear and compelling use case and not tested or scalable in a clinical setting. We propose that current approaches and traditional research methods do not support successful AI implementation in healthcare and outline a repeatable mixed-methods approach, along with several examples, that facilitates uptake of AI technologies into human-driven healthcare processes. Unlike traditional research, these methods do not seek to control for variation, but rather understand it to learn how a technology will function in practice coupled with user-centered design techniques. This approach, leveraging design thinking and quality improvement methods, aims to increase the adoption of AI in healthcare and prompt further study to understand which methods are most successful for AI implementations.
引用
收藏
页码:1061 / 1066
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, 20 BEST ONL TOOLS DE
[2]   From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider [J].
Bodenheimer, Thomas ;
Sinsky, Christine .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2014, 12 (06) :573-576
[3]   Implementing Machine Learning in Health Care - Addressing Ethical Challenges [J].
Char, Danton S. ;
Shah, Nigam H. ;
Magnus, David .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (11) :981-983
[4]  
Dam R.F., 2020, The Interaction Design Foundation
[5]  
Davenport TH, 2018, HARVARD BUS REV, V96, P108
[6]   THE QUALITY OF MEDICAL EVIDENCE - IMPLICATIONS FOR QUALITY OF CARE [J].
EDDY, DM ;
BILLINGS, J .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1988, 7 (01) :19-32
[7]   New mindset in scientific method in the health field: Design Thinking [J].
Ferreira, Fernando Kobuti ;
Song, Elaine Horibe ;
Gomes, Heitor ;
Garcia, Elvio Bueno ;
Ferreira, Lydia Masako .
CLINICS, 2015, 70 (12) :770-772
[8]   Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence [J].
Kelly, Christopher J. ;
Karthikesalingam, Alan ;
Suleyman, Mustafa ;
Corrado, Greg ;
King, Dominic .
BMC MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (01)
[9]   Using clinical simulation to study how to improve quality and safety in healthcare [J].
Lame, Guillaume ;
Dixon-Woods, Mary .
BMJ SIMULATION & TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 2020, 6 (02) :87-94
[10]   Ten Ways Artificial Intelligence Will Transform Primary Care [J].
Lin, Steven Y. ;
Mahoney, Megan R. ;
Sinsky, Christine A. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (08) :1626-1630