Stroke prognostication for discharge planning with machine learning: A derivation study

被引:24
作者
Bacchi, Stephen [1 ,2 ]
Oakden-Rayner, Luke [1 ]
Menon, David K. [3 ]
Jannes, Jim [1 ]
Kleinig, Timothy [1 ]
Koblar, Simon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] South Australian Hlth & Med Res Inst, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[3] Univ Cambridge, Div Anaesthesia, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
关键词
Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Predictive analytics; Neural network; Logistic regression; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; SCORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2020.07.046
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Post-stroke discharge planning may be aided by accurate early prognostication. Machine learning may be able to assist with such prognostication. The study's primary aim was to evaluate the performance of machine learning models using admission data to predict the likely length of stay (LOS) for patients admitted with stroke. Secondary aims included the prediction of discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS), in-hospital mortality, and discharge destination. In this study a retrospective dataset was used to develop and test a variety of machine learning models. The patients included in the study were all stroke admissions (both ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage) at a single tertiary hospital between December 2016 and September 2019. The machine learning models developed and tested (75%/25% train/test split) included logistic regression, random forests, decision trees and artificial neural networks. The study included 2840 patients. In LOS prediction the highest area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) was achieved on the unseen test dataset by an artificial neural network at 0.67. Higher AUC were achieved using logistic regression models in the prediction of discharge functional independence (mRS <2) (AUC 0.90) and in the prediction of in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.90). Logistic regression was also the best performing model for predicting home vs non-home discharge destination (AUC 0.81). This study indicates that machine learning may aid in the prognostication of factors relevant to post-stroke discharge planning. Further prospective and external validation is required, as well as assessment of the impact of subsequent implementation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 103
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Al Taleb AR, 2017, 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS, HEALTH & TECHNOLOGY (ICIHT)
[2]  
Arndt S, 2017, J NEUROINTERVENT SUR, V9, pA1
[3]   Deep Learning in the Prediction of Ischaemic Stroke Thrombolysis Functional Outcomes: A Pilot Study [J].
Bacchi, Stephen ;
Zerner, Toby ;
Oakden-Rayner, Luke ;
Kleinig, Timothy ;
Patel, Sandy ;
Jannes, Jim .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (02) :E19-E23
[4]   Hospital Discharge Disposition of Stroke Patients in Tennessee [J].
Cho, Jin S. ;
Hu, Zhen ;
Fell, Nancy ;
Heath, Gregory W. ;
Qayyum, Rehan ;
Sartipi, Mina .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 110 (09) :594-600
[5]   Thinking About the Future: A Review of Prognostic Scales Used in Acute Stroke [J].
Drozdowska, Bogna A. ;
Singh, Sarjit ;
Quinn, Terence J. .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2019, 10
[6]  
Globas C, 2012, CEREBROVASC DIS S2, V33, P529
[7]   Machine Learning-Based Model for Prediction of Outcomes in Acute Stroke [J].
Heo, JoonNyung ;
Yoon, Jihoon G. ;
Park, Hyungjong ;
Kim, Young Dae ;
Nam, Hyo Suk ;
Heo, Ji Hoe .
STROKE, 2019, 50 (05) :1263-1265
[8]   Length of stay prediction for clinical treatment process using temporal similarity [J].
Huang, Zhengxing ;
Juarez, Jose M. ;
Duan, Huilong ;
Li, Haomin .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (16) :6330-6339
[9]   A qualitative exploration of discharge destination as an outcome or a driver of acute stroke care [J].
Luker, Julie A. ;
Bernhardt, Julie ;
Grimmer, Karen A. ;
Edwards, Ian .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
[10]   Which Comorbidities and Complications Predict Ischemic Stroke Recovery and Length of Stay? [J].
Mohamed, Wazim ;
Bhattacharya, Pratik ;
Shankar, Lakshmi ;
Chaturvedi, Seemant ;
Madhavan, Ramesh .
NEUROLOGIST, 2015, 20 (02) :27-32