Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Decision Regret Scale

被引:16
作者
Xu, Richard Huan [1 ]
Zhou, Ling Ming [2 ]
Wong, Eliza Laiyi [1 ]
Wang, Dong [2 ]
Chang, Jing Hui [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Jockey Club Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Ctr Hlth Syst & Policy Res, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Sch Hlth Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2020年 / 11卷
关键词
decisional regret; confirmatory factor analysis; classical test theory; item response theory; China; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PATIENT-REPORTED MEASURE; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; VALIDATION; SATISFACTION; COLLABORATE; ASSOCIATION; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.583574
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the decision regret scale (DRSc). Methods The data of 704 patients who completed the DRSc were used for the analyses. We evaluated the construct, convergent/discriminant, and known-group validity; internal consistency and test-retest reliability; and the item invariance of the DRSc. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to confirm the optimal cutoff point of the scale. Results A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that a one-factor model fits the data. The internal consistency (alpha = 0.74) and test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.71] of the DRSc were acceptable. The DRSc demonstrated unidimensionality and invariance for use across the sexes. It was confirmed that an optimal cutoff point of 25 could discriminate between patients with high and low decisional regret during clinical practice. Conclusion The DRSc is a parsimonious instrument that can be used to measure the uncertainty inherent in medical decisions. It can be employed to provide knowledge, offer support, and elicit patient preferences in an attempt to promote shared decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]   Developing CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Barr, Paul James ;
Grande, Stuart W. ;
Thompson, Rachel ;
Walsh, Thom ;
Ozanne, Elissa M. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 93 (01) :102-107
[12]   What if?: Regret and cancer-related decisions [J].
Feldman-Stewart, Deb ;
Siemens, D. Robert .
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (9-10) :295-+
[13]   Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments [J].
Floyd, FJ ;
Widaman, KF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :286-299
[14]   Using CollaboRATE, a brief patient-reported measure of shared decision making: Results from three clinical settings in the United States [J].
Forcino, Rachel C. ;
Barr, Paul J. ;
O'Malley, A. James ;
Arend, Roger ;
Castaldo, Molly G. ;
Ozanne, Elissa M. ;
Percac-Lima, Sanja ;
Stults, Cheryl D. ;
Tai-Seale, Ming ;
Thompson, Rachel ;
Elwyn, Glyn .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2018, 21 (01) :82-89
[15]   Assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased German people with cancer-A psychometric validation of the Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers [J].
Haun, Markus W. ;
Schakowski, Alexander ;
Preibsch, Ariane ;
Friederich, Hans-Christoph ;
Hartmann, Mechthild .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2019, 22 (05) :1089-1099
[16]   Use Omega Rather than Cronbach's Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But horizontal ellipsis [J].
Hayes, Andrew F. ;
Coutts, Jacob J. .
COMMUNICATION METHODS AND MEASURES, 2020, 14 (01) :1-24
[17]  
Hoyle RH., 2012, HDB STRUCTURAL EQUAT
[18]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55
[19]   Regret appraisals, age, and subjective well-being [J].
Jokisaari, M .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2003, 37 (06) :487-503
[20]   The importance and complexity of regret in the measurement of 'good' decisions: a systematic review and a content analysis of existing assessment instruments [J].
Joseph-Williams, Natalie ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Elwyn, Glyn .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2011, 14 (01) :59-83