Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation

被引:38
作者
Laczo, Bence [2 ]
Antal, Andrea [1 ]
Rothkegel, Holger [3 ]
Paulus, Walter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Univ Med Ctr, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Albert Szent Gyorgyi Univ, Dept Neurol, Szeged, Hungary
[3] Imland Clin Rendsburg, Dept Psychiat, Rendsburg, Germany
关键词
tRNS; tDCS; leg motor cortex; TMS; human; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; STOCHASTIC RESONANCE; BRAIN; THRESHOLDS; MODULATION; ACTIVATION; ASYMMETRY; CURRENTS; FORCE;
D O I
10.3233/RNN-130367
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Purpose: Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) can increase the excitability of hand area of the primary motor cortex (M1). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of tRNS and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the leg motor cortex. Method: Ten healthy subjects received anodal, cathodal tDCS, tRNS and sham stimulation for 10 min using 2 mA intensity during separate experimental sessions. Single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induced motor evoked potential (MEP) measurements were used to assess motor cortical excitability changes after the stimulation. Results: Similar to the hand area, we found that both tRNS and anodal tDCS induced an increase of the amplitude of the MEPs. Anodal tDCS induced a constant gradual increase of corticospinal excitability until 60 min post-stimulation, whereas the effect of tRNS was immediate with a duration of 40 min following stimulation. The cathodal tDCS induced decrease in MEP amplitude did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Our results suggest that although the leg area has a deeper position in the cortex compared to the hand area, it can be reached by weak transcranial currents. Both anodal tDCS and tRNS had comparable effect on cortical excitability.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 410
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Non pharmacological interventions for spasticity in multiple sclerosis [J].
Amatya, Bhasker ;
Khan, Fary ;
La Mantia, Loredana ;
Demetrios, Marina ;
Wade, Derick T. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (02)
[2]   Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: Comparison of tDCS and tRNS [J].
Ambrus, Geza Gergely ;
Paulus, Walter ;
Antal, Andrea .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 121 (11) :1908-1914
[3]   Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex [J].
Antal, Andrea ;
Terney, Daniella ;
Poreisz, Csaba ;
Paulus, Walter .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 26 (09) :2687-2691
[4]   Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI [J].
Antal, Andrea ;
Polania, Rafael ;
Schmidt-Samoa, Carsten ;
Dechent, Peter ;
Paulus, Walter .
NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 55 (02) :590-596
[5]   Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans [J].
Batsikadze, G. ;
Moliadze, V. ;
Paulus, W. ;
Kuo, M. -F. ;
Nitsche, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (07) :1987-2000
[6]  
Baudewig J, 2001, MAGN RESON MED, V45, P196, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200102)45:2<196::AID-MRM1026>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-1
[8]   ACTION OF BRIEF POLARIZING CURRENTS ON CEREBRAL CORTEX OF RAT .1. DURING CURRENT FLOW + .2. IN PRODUCTION OF LONG-LECTING AFTER-EFFECTS [J].
BINDMAN, LJ ;
LIPPOLD, OCJ ;
REDFEARN, JW .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1964, 172 (03) :369-&
[9]   Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on bimanual movements [J].
Chen, JT ;
Lin, YY ;
Shan, DE ;
Wu, ZA ;
Hallett, M ;
Liao, KK .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 93 (01) :53-63
[10]  
Cicinelli P, 1997, MUSCLE NERVE, V20, P535, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199705)20:5<535::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO