Effect of timing of morphine administration during remifentanil-based anaesthesia on early recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative pain

被引:35
作者
Muñoz, HR [1 ]
Guerrero, ME [1 ]
Brandes, V [1 ]
Cortínez, LI [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anaesthet, Santiago, Chile
关键词
analgesics opioid; morphine; remifentanil; pain; postoperative;
D O I
10.1093/bja/88.6.814
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. Since the time to peak analgesic effect of intravenous morphine can be longer than 40-60 min in volunteers, the goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of the timing of intraoperative morphine administration on early postoperative pain. Methods. A total of 120 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied. Anaesthesia was induced with remifentanil and etomidate and maintained with remifentanil and sevoflurane/nitrous oxide. Morphine 150 mug kg(-1) was given randomly at three different times during surgery, and a fourth group received placebo. Times to eyes opening and extubation were measured, and pain was evaluated in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Morphine 2-3 mg was given when the VAS score was greater than or equal to50 mm. The four groups were, according to the time elapsed from morphine administration to the end of surgery, group 1 (n=30): placebo; group 2 (n=33): <20 min; group 3 (n=30): 20-40 min; group 4 (n=27): >40 min. Results. Recovery from anaesthesia and pain scores were similar in all groups. However, mean (sd) morphine consumption was 5.7 (4.7) mg in group 1, 4.4 (4.2) mg in group 2, 4.7 (4.7) mg in group 3, and 2.2 (4.0) mg in group 4 (P<0.05, group 1 vs 4). Morphine was required in only 38% of patients in group 4 compared with 83%, 67% and 69% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P<0.01, group 1 vs 4). Conclusions. The timing of intraoperative morphine administration did not affect the early recovery from anaesthesia. However, the reduction in the number of patients requiring morphine in the PACU when morphine had been given more than 40 min before the end of surgery supports this practice, rather than administration closer to the end of surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:814 / 818
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Albrecht S, 1999, ANESTH ANALG, V89, pS40, DOI 10.1097/00000539-199910001-00008
[2]   Postoperative pain control following remifentanil-based anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery [J].
Albrecht, S ;
Fechner, J ;
Geisslinger, G ;
Maass, AB ;
Upadhyaya, B ;
Moecke, HP ;
Haigh, C ;
Schüttler, J .
ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (04) :315-322
[3]   A multicenter evaluation of remifentanil for early postoperative analgesia [J].
Bowdle, TA ;
Camporesi, EM ;
Maysick, L ;
Hogue, CW ;
Miguel, RV ;
Pitts, M ;
Streisand, JB .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (06) :1292-1297
[4]   Hydromorphone analgesia after intravenous bolus administration [J].
Coda, B ;
Tanaka, A ;
Jacobson, RC ;
Donaldson, G ;
Chapman, CR .
PAIN, 1997, 71 (01) :41-48
[5]   THE VALUE OF PREEMPTIVE ANALGESIA IN THE TREATMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN [J].
DAHL, JB ;
KEHLET, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 70 (04) :434-439
[6]   The efficacy of intravenous 0.15 versus 0.25 mg/kg intraoperative morphine for immediate postoperative analgesia after remifentanil-based anesthesia for major surgery [J].
Fletcher, D ;
Pinaud, M ;
Scherpereel, P ;
Clyti, N ;
Chauvin, M .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (03) :666-671
[7]  
Glass PSA, 1999, ANESTH ANALG, V89, pS7, DOI 10.1097/00000539-199910001-00003
[8]   MORPHINE DOES NOT AFFECT THE AWAKENING CONCENTRATION OF SEVOFLURANE [J].
KATOH, T ;
SUGURO, Y ;
KIMURA, T ;
IKEDA, K .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1993, 40 (09) :825-828
[9]   Preemptive analgesia - Why its effect is not always obvious [J].
Kissin, I .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (05) :1015-1019
[10]   Postoperative pain management and recovery after remifentanil-based anaesthesia with isoflurane or propofol for major abdominal surgery [J].
Kochs, E ;
Côté, D ;
Deruyck, L ;
Rauhala, V ;
Puig, M ;
Polati, E ;
Verbist, J ;
Upadhyaya, B ;
Haigh, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (02) :169-173