Carbon dioxide insufflation improves the intubation depth and total enteroscopy rate in single-balloon enteroscopy: a randomised, controlled, double-blind trial

被引:37
作者
Li, Xuan [1 ]
Zhao, Yun-Jia [1 ]
Dai, Jun [1 ]
Li, Xiao-Bo [1 ]
Xue, Han-Bin [1 ]
Zhang, Yao [1 ]
Xiong, Guang-Su [1 ]
Ohtsuka, Kazuo [2 ]
Gao, Yun-Jie [1 ]
Liu, Qiang [1 ]
Song, Yan [1 ]
Fang, Jing-Yuan [1 ]
Ge, Zhi-Zheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Renji Hosp, Sch Med,Shanghai Inst Digest Dis, Shanghai 200001, Peoples R China
[2] Showa Univ, Northern Yokohama Hosp, Ctr Digest Dis, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
SMALL-BOWEL; THERAPEUTIC YIELD; PULL ENTEROSCOPY;
D O I
10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306069
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective The total enteroscopy rate of single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) using air insufflation is not satisfactory, and whether carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation increases the total enteroscopy rate of SBE is unknown. This randomised controlled trial aimed to determine whether CO2 insufflation facilitates the intubation depth and total enteroscopy rate of SBE. Design A total of 214 eligible patients referred for SBE were randomised to receive either air or CO2 insufflation, and included in the intention-to-test (ITT) analysis. In addition, 199 patients in whom enteroscopy was completed were included in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. Both the patients and endoscopists were blinded, and the intubation depth and total enteroscopy rate were defined as the primary outcomes. Results The CO2 group showed a superiority of intubation in the ITT analysis (oral route: 323.8 +/- 64.2 vs 238.3 +/- 68.6 cm; anal route: 261.6 +/- 74.2 vs 174.7 +/- 62.1 cm, both p<0.001), and the total enteroscopy rate (34.9% vs 17.6%, p=0.006). Similar results were obtained in a PP analysis for both outcomes. In addition, in the PP analysis, the addition of circumference after the procedure was less in the CO2 group (0.8 +/- 0.6 vs 3.3 +/- 1.8 cm, p=0.005) for the oral route. No serious complications were reported. The overall percentage of procedures with significant pathological findings was 52.8%; the rates were 58.5% and 47.2% (p=0.100, ITT analysis) in the CO2 and air groups, respectively. Conclusions CO2 insufflation improves the intubation depth and total enteroscopy rate in SBE with a good safety profile and acceptability compared with that of air, and thus is recommended for clinical utilisation.
引用
收藏
页码:1560 / 1565
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Complications of single-balloon enteroscopy: a prospective evaluation of 166 procedures [J].
Aktas, H. ;
de Ridder, L. ;
Haringsma, J. ;
Kuipers, E. J. ;
Mensink, P. B. F. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 42 (05) :365-368
[2]   Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial [J].
Bretthauer, M. ;
Seip, B. ;
Aasen, S. ;
Kordal, M. ;
Hoff, G. ;
Aabakken, L. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 39 (01) :58-64
[3]   Carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: Safe and effective in sedated patients [J].
Bretthauer, M ;
Lynge, AB ;
Thiis-Evensen, E ;
Hoff, G ;
Fausa, O ;
Aabakken, L .
ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 37 (08) :706-709
[4]   NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy [J].
Bretthauer, M ;
Thiis-Evensen, E ;
Huppertz-Hauss, G ;
Gisselsson, L ;
Grotmol, T ;
Skovlund, E ;
Hoff, G .
GUT, 2002, 50 (05) :604-607
[5]   The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review [J].
Dellon, Evan S. ;
Hawk, James S. ;
Grimm, Ian S. ;
Shaheen, Nicholas J. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (04) :843-849
[6]   Carbon dioxide insufflation improves intubation depth in double-balloon enteroscopy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial [J].
Domagk, D. ;
Bretthauer, M. ;
Lenz, P. ;
Aabakken, L. ;
Ullerich, H. ;
Maaser, C. ;
Domschke, W. ;
Kucharzik, T. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 39 (12) :1064-1067
[7]   Single- vs. double-balloon enteroscopy in small-bowel diagnostics: a randomized multicenter trial [J].
Domagk, D. ;
Mensink, P. ;
Aktas, H. ;
Lenz, P. ;
Meister, T. ;
Luegering, A. ;
Ullerich, H. ;
Aabakken, L. ;
Heinecke, A. ;
Domschke, W. ;
Kuipers, E. ;
Bretthauer, M. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 43 (06) :472-476
[8]   Carbon dioxide insufflation compared with air insufflation in double-balloon enteroscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial [J].
Hirai, Fumihito ;
Beppu, Takahiro ;
Nishimura, Taku ;
Takatsu, Noritaka ;
Ashizuka, Shinya ;
Seki, Takehiko ;
Hisabe, Takashi ;
Nagahama, Takashi ;
Yao, Kenshi ;
Matsui, Toshiyuki ;
Beppu, Tsuyoshi ;
Nakashima, Rikiya ;
Inada, Naomi ;
Tajiri, Eriko ;
Mitsuru, Hideko ;
Shigematsu, Hideko .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (04) :743-749
[9]   Diagnostic and therapeutic yield of single balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel disease: Results of the Italian multicentre study [J].
Manno, Mauro ;
Riccioni, Maria Elena ;
Cannizzaro, Renato ;
Andreoli, Arnaldo ;
Marmo, Riccardo ;
Pennazio, Marco .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2013, 45 (03) :211-215
[10]   Double-balloon enteroscopy (push-and-pull enteroscopy) of the small bowel: feasibility and diagnostic and therapeutic yield in patients with suspected small bowel disease [J].
May, A ;
Nachbar, L ;
Ell, C .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (01) :62-70