An estimation of the long-term clinical and economic benefits of insulin lispro in Type 1 diabetes in the UK

被引:11
作者
Pratoomsoot, C. [1 ]
Smith, H. T. [2 ]
Kalsekar, A. [3 ]
Boye, K. S. [3 ]
Arellano, J. [2 ]
Valentine, W. J. [4 ]
机构
[1] IMS Hlth, Allschwil, Switzerland
[2] Eli Lilly & Co, Surrey, England
[3] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[4] Ossian Hlth Econ & Commun, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; insulin lispro; regular human insulin; Type; 1; diabetes; UK; BLOOD-GLUCOSE CONTROL; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; IMPROVED GLYCEMIC CONTROL; IDDM PATIENTS; REGULAR INSULIN; NOCTURNAL HYPOGLYCEMIA; ANALOG LISPRO; DOUBLE-BLIND; NPH INSULIN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02775.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims To determine the long-term health economic benefits associated with lispro vs. regular human insulin (RHI) in UK Type 1 diabetic (T1DM) patients using the previously published and validated CORE Diabetes Model. Methods A literature review designed to capture clinical benefits associated with lispro and T1DM cohort characteristics specific to UK was undertaken. Clinical benefits were derived from a Cochrane meta-analysis. The estimated difference (weighted mean) in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) was -0.1% (95% confidence interval -0.2 to 0.0%) for lispro vs. RHI. Severe hypoglycaemia rates for lispro and RHI were 21.8 and 46.1 events per 100 patient years, respectively. Costs and disutilities were accounted for severe hypoglycaemia rates. All costs were accounted in 2007 UK pound from a National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Future costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 3.5% annually. Results In the base-case analysis, lispro was projected to be dominant compared with RHI. Lispro was associated with improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) of approximately 0.10 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) vs. RHI (7.60 vs. 7.50 QALYs). Lifetime direct medical costs per patient were lower with lispro treatment, 70 pound 576 vs. 72 pound 529. Severe hypoglycaemia rates were the key driver in terms of differences in QALE and lifetime costs. Sensitivity analyses with assumptions around time horizon, discounting rates and benefits in terms of glycaemic control or hypoglycaemic event rates revealed that lispro remained dominant. Conclusions Our findings suggest that lispro is likely to improve QALE, reduce frequency of diabetes-related complications and lifetime medical costs compared with RHI.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 814
页数:12
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] The effect of the insulin analog lispro on nighttime blood glucose control in type 1 diabetic patients
    Ahmed, ABE
    Home, PD
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (01) : 32 - 37
  • [2] Improved mealtime treatment of diabetes mellitus using an insulin analogue
    Anderson, JH
    Brunelle, RL
    Koivisto, VA
    Trautmann, ME
    Vignati, L
    DiMarchi, R
    Cameron, DP
    Yeu, DK
    Zimmet, P
    Lauvaux, JP
    VanGaal, LF
    Chiasson, JL
    Fettes, IM
    Tan, MH
    Toth, EL
    Charbonnel, B
    Selam, JL
    Haslbeck, M
    SchulzeSchleppinghoff, B
    Karasik, A
    Hazenberg, HJ
    VanDoorn, LG
    Bonnici, FB
    Hough, S
    Mollentze, WF
    Moore, R
    Omar, MA
    Robertson, LI
    VanRooyen, RJ
    DeLeiva, A
    Jara, A
    Vazquez, JA
    Arslanian, S
    Bastyr, EJ
    Bergenstal, RM
    Blonde, L
    Boyce, PA
    Chase, HP
    Clarke, DH
    Davidson, J
    Garber, A
    Goldberg, RB
    Guthrie, RA
    Mayfield, RK
    Mengel, MC
    Prince, MJ
    Reeves, ML
    Rosenzweig, JL
    Schade, DS
    Soeldner, JS
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1997, 19 (01) : 62 - 72
  • [3] Reduction of postprandial hyperglycemia and frequency of hypoglycemia in IDDM patients on insulin-analog treatment
    Anderson, JH
    Brunelle, RL
    Koivisto, VA
    Pfutzner, A
    Trautmann, ME
    Vignati, L
    DiMarchi, R
    Bowen, KM
    Cameron, DP
    Nankervis, AJ
    Roberts, AP
    Zimmet, P
    Borkenstein, MH
    Schernthaner, G
    Waldhausl, WK
    DeLeeuw, IH
    Fery, F
    Scheen, A
    Somers, G
    Fettes, IM
    Tildesley, HD
    Toth, EL
    Viikari, J
    Altman, JJ
    Bougneres, PF
    Drouin, P
    Fossati, P
    Guillausseau, PJ
    Marechaud, E
    Riou, JP
    Selam, JL
    Vialettes, PB
    Beyer, J
    Federlin, K
    Fussganger, RD
    Gries, FA
    Jastram, HU
    Koop, I
    Landgraf, R
    Rosak, C
    Schatz, H
    SchulzeSchleppinghoff, B
    Seif, FJ
    Stoeckmann, F
    Karasik, A
    Weitzman, S
    Andreani, D
    Bompiani, G
    Crepaldi, G
    Giorgino, R
    [J]. DIABETES, 1997, 46 (02) : 265 - 270
  • [4] Annuzzi G, 2001, NUTR METAB CARDIOVAS, V11, P168
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2004, GUID METH TECHN APPR
  • [6] [Anonymous], SHORT ACTING INSULIN
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2007, KURZW INS BEH DIAB M
  • [8] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2003, BURD DIS INJ AUSTR
  • [9] EMERGING STANDARDS FOR DIABETES CARE FROM A CITY-WIDE PRIMARY-CARE AUDIT
    BENETT, IJ
    LAMBERT, C
    HINDS, G
    KIRTON, C
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1994, 11 (05) : 489 - 492
  • [10] Comparison of insulin aspart with buffered regular insulin and insulin lispro in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion - A randomized study in type 1 diabetes
    Bode, B
    Raskin, P
    Weinstein, R
    Davidson, J
    Bell, D
    Henry, R
    McGill, J
    Huang, WC
    Nadeau, D
    Reinhardt, RR
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (03) : 439 - 444