Vertical distraction osteogenesis of fibula transplants for mandibular reconstruction -: a preliminary study

被引:62
作者
Klesper, B [1 ]
Lazar, F [1 ]
Siessegger, M [1 ]
Hidding, J [1 ]
Zöller, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1010-5182(02)90315-X
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: When reconstructing the mandible after tumour resection with a fibular graft, the mandible is often vertically deficient, making placement of dental implants impossible. Patients: Segmental vertical distraction of the reconstructed mandible was performed in nine patients following tumour surgery between February 1998 and 2001. Their age was 14-65 years (average 46.3); all underwent radiotherapy with a dose of up to 55.6 Gy prior to tumour resection. Mandibular discontinuity was repaired with a microvascular fibular bone graft. All grafts had a vertical bone deficit ranging from 9 to 12 mm when compared with the non-resected part of the mandibles. Methods: All patients underwent, segmental vertical distraction of the transplants. The distraction devices were applied intraorally. Distraction of 1.0 mm/day : was performed using a Martin(R) distractor (TRACK 1.5) followed by 12 weeks retention time. Results: The increase of vertical bone height was stable and enabled placement of dental implants without any complications. Conclusion: Vertical distraction osteogenesis may become a common procedure in the treatment of alveolar, ridge, deficiency resulting from transplanting fibulae for mandibular reconstruction following tumour surgery. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. on behalf of European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 285
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation in the dog using distraction osteogenesis [J].
Block, MS ;
Chang, A ;
Crawford, C .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 54 (03) :309-314
[2]   Die mandibuläre distraktionsosteogeneseVorläufige tierexperimentelle ergebnisse mit einer dental fixierten distraktionsapparaturMandibular distraction osteogenesisPreliminary results of an animal study with a dentally fixed distraction device [J].
B. Braumann ;
B. Niederhagen ;
C. Schmolke .
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 1997, 58 (6) :298-305
[3]   Distraction osteogenesis for lengthening of the hard palate .1. A possible new treatment concept for velopharyngeal incompetence. Experimental study in dogs [J].
Carls, FR ;
Jackson, IT ;
Topf, JS .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 100 (07) :1635-1647
[4]   Seven years clinical experience with mandibular distraction in children [J].
Carls, FR ;
Sailer, HF .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 26 (04) :197-208
[5]   Distraction osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery using internal devices: Review of five cases [J].
Chin, M ;
Toth, BA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 54 (01) :45-53
[6]  
Hidding J., 1998, J CRANIOMAXILLOFAC S, V26, P72
[7]  
Hidding J., 1999, MUND KIEFER GESICHTS, V3, P79
[8]   Correction of mandibular hypoplasia by means of bidirectional callus distraction [J].
Klein, C ;
Howaldt, HP .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 7 (04) :258-266
[9]  
Klein C, 1997, INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES, P345
[10]  
KLEIN C, 1997, MUND KIEFER GESIC S1, V1, P98