Effect of postoperative radiotherapy on survival in duodenal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-adjusted analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

被引:7
作者
Lim, Yu Jin [1 ]
Kim, Kyubo [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Sch Med, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 23 Kyungheedae Ro, Seoul 02447, South Korea
[2] Ewha Womans Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1071 Anyangcheon Ro, Seoul 07985, South Korea
关键词
Duodenal neoplasms; Adjuvant radiotherapy; Propensity score; Survival analysis; Prognosis; SMALL-BOWEL ADENOCARCINOMA; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; MATCHED ANALYSIS; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; MANAGEMENT; AMPULLARY; EXPERIENCE; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s10147-017-1226-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The use of adjuvant treatment has not been sufficiently investigated in duodenal adenocarcinoma. This study evaluated the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on survival outcomes in this rare malignancy. We identified patients who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed before and after propensity score matching. Among the 701 eligible patients, 116 (17%) underwent PORT. There were no significant differences in OS and DSS according to receipt of PORT in the unmatched population (P = 0.982 and 0.496, respectively), whereas the propensity-matched analysis showed improved OS and DSS with PORT (P = 0.053 and 0.019, respectively). No receipt of PORT was an independent poor prognostic factor in multivariate analysis of both OS (P = 0.022) and DSS (P = 0.005). The potential survival benefits of PORT were observed in subgroups of T4 stage, larger tumor size, higher lymph node ratio, and total/radical resection. We provide useful insights into the therapeutic role of PORT in adenocarcinoma of the duodenum. Adjuvant strategy with PORT needs to be considered in locally advanced tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 481
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, SURV EP END REPROG
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, INT CLASSIFICATION D
[3]   An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (03) :399-424
[4]   What prognostic factors are important in duodenal adenocarcinoma? [J].
Bakaeen, FG ;
Murr, MM ;
Sarr, MG ;
Thompson, GB ;
Farnell, MB ;
Nagorney, DM ;
Farley, DR ;
van Heerden, JA ;
Wiersema, LM ;
Schleck, CD ;
Donohue, JH .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2000, 135 (06) :635-641
[5]   Duodenal adenocarcinoma: Advances in diagnosis and surgical management [J].
Cloyd, Jordan M. ;
George, Elizabeth ;
Visser, Brendan C. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 8 (03) :212-221
[6]   Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiotherapy in the Management of Patients With Surgically Resected Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Nationwide Clinical Oncology Database [J].
Ecker, Brett L. ;
McMillan, Matthew T. ;
Datta, Jashodeep ;
Lee, Major K. ;
Karakousis, Giorgos C. ;
Vollmer, Charles M. ;
Drebin, Jeffrey A. ;
Fraker, Douglas L. ;
Roses, Robert E. .
CANCER, 2017, 123 (06) :967-976
[7]   Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for small bowel adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis [J].
Ecker, Brett L. ;
McMillan, Matthew T. ;
Datta, Jashodeep ;
Mamtani, Ronac ;
Giantonio, Bruce J. ;
Dempsey, Daniel T. ;
Fraker, Douglas L. ;
Drebin, Jeffrey A. ;
Karakousis, Giorgos C. ;
Roses, Robert E. .
CANCER, 2016, 122 (05) :693-701
[8]   Indications for propensity scores and review of their use in pharmacoepidemiology [J].
Glynn, RJ ;
Schneeweiss, S ;
Stürmer, T .
BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 98 (03) :253-259
[9]   Defining the Role of Adjuvant Therapy: Ampullary and Duodenal Adenocarcinoma [J].
Jabbour, Selma K. ;
Mulvihill, David .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 24 (02) :85-93
[10]   Extent of resection in the management of duodenal adenocarcinoma [J].
Kaklamanos, IG ;
Bathe, OF ;
Franceschi, D ;
Camarda, C ;
Levi, J ;
Livingstone, AS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (01) :37-41