Outcome of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation ( PTNS) for Fecal Incontinence

被引:36
作者
Hotouras, Alexander [1 ]
Murphy, Jamie [1 ]
Walsh, Una [1 ]
Allison, Marion [1 ]
Curry, Ann [1 ]
Williams, Norman S. [1 ]
Knowles, Charles [1 ]
Chan, Christopher L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Ctr Digest Dis, Barts & London Sch Med & Dent, Acad Surg Unit,Blizard Inst, London, England
关键词
anorectal physiology; fecal incontinence; neuromodulation; PTNS; tibial nerve stimulation; PERIPHERAL NEUROMODULATION;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a6266c
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in fecal incontinence (FI). Background: There is extensive evidence regarding the efficacy of PTNS in urinary incontinence. Data on the efficacy of PTNS for FI are limited to a few small case series with relatively short-follow up. Methods: A prospective cohort of patients with FI was studied. Incontinence scores were measured using a validated questionnaire (Cleveland Clinic Florida-FI score) at specific time points: before treatment, after completion of a treatment course (12 PTNS sessions), and before the last maintenance (top-up) therapy. Deferment time and average number of weekly incontinence episodes were also estimated from a prospective bowel dairy kept by the patient at these time points. Quality of life was assessed with the Rockwood Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire. Results: A total of 150 patients were recruited to the study between January 2008 and June 2012. Analysis was performed on 115 patients who continued to receive PTNS after a median follow-up of 26 (range, 12-42) months. The baseline Cleveland Clinic Florida-FI score SD (12.0 +/- 3.9) improved after 12 PTNS sessions (9.4 +/- 4.6, P < 0.0001) and after top-up treatments (10.0 +/- 4.3, P < 0.0001). The increase in the Cleveland Clinic Florida-FI score between the end of the 12th session and the last top-up therapy was also significant (P = 0.04). A similar pattern was seen for the deferment time and the quality of life scores. The median time between top-up sessions was 12 months (range, 1-40 months), significantly longer than the recommended interval of 6 months. Conclusions: PTNS is a well-tolerated treatment with high acceptability in the majority of patients. It provides a sustained improvement in FI up to 42 months in a relatively noninvasive manner. The effect of PTNS diminishes with time and additional therapy sessions at 6 monthly intervals may result in greater improvements. PTNS ought to be considered as the first step in all patients with FI refractory to maximum conservative therapies.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 943
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Brown SR, 2010, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD001757.pub3, 10.1002/14651858.CD001757.pub4]
[2]   Evaluation of the Use of Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Study [J].
de la Portilla, Fernando ;
Rada, Ricardo ;
Vega, Juan ;
Almeida Gonzalez, Carmen ;
Cisneros, Nieves ;
Hugo Maldonado, Victor .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (08) :1427-1433
[3]   Therapeutic devices for fecal incontinence: dynamic graciloplasty, artificial bowel sphincter and sacral nerve stimulation [J].
Edden, Yair ;
Wexner, Steven D. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2009, 6 (03) :307-312
[4]   Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Effects on Detrusor Overactivity Incontinence are Not Due to a Placebo Effect: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial [J].
Finazzi-Agro, Enrico ;
Petta, Filomena ;
Sciobica, Francesco ;
Pasqualetti, Patrizio ;
Musco, Stefania ;
Bove, Pierluigi .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (05) :2001-2006
[5]   Peripheral neuromodulation via posterior tibial nerve stimulation - a potential treatment for faecal incontinence? [J].
Findlay, John M. ;
Yeung, Justin M. C. ;
Robinson, Rachel ;
Greaves, Helen ;
Maxwell-Armstrong, Charles .
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2010, 92 (05) :385-390
[6]   Long-Term Outcomes of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence [J].
George, Anil T. ;
Kalmar, Katalin ;
Panarese, Alessandra ;
Dudding, Thomas C. ;
Nicholls, Ralph J. ;
Vaizey, Carolynne J. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2012, 55 (03) :302-306
[7]   A prospective multicentre study to investigate percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence [J].
Govaert, B. ;
Pares, D. ;
Delgado-Aros, S. ;
La Torre, F. ;
van Gemert, W. G. ;
Baeten, C. G. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (12) :1236-1241
[8]   Sacral nerve stimulation increases activation of the primary somatosensory cortex by anal canal stimulation in an experimental model [J].
Griffin, K. M. ;
Pickering, M. ;
O'Herlihy, C. ;
O'Connell, P. R. ;
Jones, J. F. X. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (08) :1160-1169
[9]  
Gurusamy K S, 2005, Int J Surg, V3, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2005.07.004
[10]   Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in females with faecal incontinence: the impact of sphincter morphology and rectal sensation on the clinical outcome [J].
Hotouras, A. ;
Thaha, M. A. ;
Allison, M. E. ;
Currie, A. ;
Scott, S. M. ;
Chan, C. L. H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (07) :927-930