Hypertonic dextrose versus corticosteroid local injection for the treatment of osteoarthritis in the first carpometacarpal joint: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

被引:41
作者
Jahangiri, Azadeh [1 ]
Moghaddam, Farid Rezaiee [1 ]
Najafi, Sharif [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Republ Iran Army Univ Med Sci, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Tehran, Iran
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; HAND OSTEOARTHRITIS; PROLOTHERAPY; THERAPIES;
D O I
10.1007/s00776-014-0587-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
To compare the advantages of prolotherapy in the treatment of first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (OA) with those of corticosteroid local injection in the short and long term. We performed a randomized controlled trial from March 2010 to March 2011 in an outpatient clinic at a university hospital. Sixty participants (60 hands) with OA of the first carpometacarpal joint were assigned equally to two groups. For the corticosteroid group, after 2 monthly saline placebo injections, a single dose of 40 mg methylprednisolone acetate (0.5 ml) mixed with 0.5 ml of 2 % lidocaine was injected. For the dextrose (DX) group, 0.5 ml of 20 % DX was mixed with 0.5 ml of 2 % lidocaine and the injection was repeated monthly for 3 months. Pain intensity, hand function and the strength of lateral pinch grip were measured at the baseline and at 1, 2, and 6 months after the treatment. Mean age (STD) was 63.6 (9.7) years, and mean (STD) visual analog scale (VAS) was 6 (2). The two groups were comparable at 2 months, but significantly different at 1 month, with better results for corticosteroid, and at 6 months with apparently more favorable outcome for DX [mean difference (95 % CI) in VAS = 1.1 (0.2, 2.0), p = 0.02]. After 6 months of treatment, both DX and corticosteroid injection increased functional level, but DX seemed to be more effective [mean difference (95 % CI) in total function score = 1.0 (0.2, 1.8), p = 0.01]. For the long term, DX seems to be more advantageous, while the two treatments were comparable in the short term. Because of the satisfactory pain relief and restoring of function, we would prefer DX prolotherapy for the treatment of patients with OA. Therapeutic studies--investigating the results of treatment; level I.
引用
收藏
页码:737 / 743
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Bruce B, 2003, J RHEUMATOL, V30, P167
[2]   Nonsurgical Interventional Therapies for Low Back Pain A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Atlas, Steven J. ;
Stanos, Steven P. ;
Rosenquist, Richard W. .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (10) :1078-1093
[3]   The use of prolotherapy in the sacroiliac joint [J].
Cusi, M. ;
Saunders, J. ;
Hungerford, B. ;
Wisbey-Roth, T. ;
Lucas, P. ;
Wilson, S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 44 (02) :100-104
[4]  
Dagenais S, 2007, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V18
[5]   Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with prolotherapy [J].
Dagenais, Simon ;
Mayer, John ;
Haldeman, Scott ;
Borg-Stein, Joanne .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (01) :203-212
[6]   Side effects and adverse events related to intraligamentous injection of sclerosing solutions (Prolotherapy) for back and neck pain: A survey of practitioners [J].
Dagenais, Simon ;
Ogunseitan, Adele ;
Haldeman, Scott ;
Wooley, James R. ;
Newcomb, Robert L. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 87 (07) :909-913
[7]  
Dagenais Simon, 2005, Spine J, V5, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.09.011
[8]  
Godwin M, 2004, CAN FAM PHYSICIAN, V50, P241
[9]   Early inflammatory response of knee ligaments to prolotherapy in a rat model [J].
Jensen, Kristina T. ;
Rabago, David P. ;
Best, Thomas M. ;
Patterson, Jeffrey J. ;
Vanderby, Ray, Jr. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2008, 26 (06) :816-823
[10]  
Joshi R, 2005, J RHEUMATOL, V32, P1305