An audit of the efficacy of a structured handover tool in obstetric anaesthesia

被引:6
作者
Dharmadasa, A. [1 ]
Bailes, I. [1 ]
Gough, K. [1 ]
Ebrahimi, N. [1 ]
Robinson, P. N. [1 ]
Lucas, D. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwick Pk Hosp & Clin Res Ctr, Dept Anaesthet, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
关键词
SAFE; Handover; Tool; Obstetric; Anaesthesia; Safety;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.12.002
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Introduction: The SAFE handover tool was developed to reduce critical omissions during handovers in obstetric anaesthesia. It comprises a simple proforma onto which the outgoing team documents patients who fall into one of four anaesthetically relevant categories: Sick patients; At-risk patients (of emergency caesarean section, major haemorrhage or anaesthetic problems); Followups; and Epidurals. We hypothesised that its use would reduce the number of critical omissions at handover. Methods: The efficacy of the SAFE handover tool was assessed through several audit cycles in a single maternity unit. The four SAFE categories were considered the gold standard, since they encompassed the consensus opinion of senior obstetric anaesthetists with respect to parturients they most wanted to know about at handover. Against these criteria it was possible to compare the number of cases that should have been handed-over against the number that were actually handed-over. Results: After implementation of the handover tool, patients were four times more likely to be handed-over than without the use of the tool: an increase from 49% to 79% of relevant cases (P < 0.0001, OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.19-7.6). The handover tool was particularly effective at increasing the handover rates of Sick and At-risk parturients, which increased from 21% to 67%(P < 0.0001, OR 7.7, 95% CI 2.7-21.7) and 25% to 78% (P < 0.01, OR 9.9, 95% CI 1.6-61.6), respectively. Conclusion: The SAFE handover tool significantly increased handover rates of anaesthetically relevant parturients. It is easy to remember and consistent with UK National Health Service Litigation Authority's guidance on risk management in maternity units. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The role of supraglottic airway devices in obstetric anaesthesia
    Metodiev, Yavor
    Mushambi, Mary
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 36 (03) : 276 - 280
  • [32] Another look at religious objections to obstetric anaesthesia
    McKenzie, A. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2016, 27 : 62 - 65
  • [33] Sedation and anaesthesia for non-obstetric surgery
    Bonnet, Marie-Pierre
    ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 : S35 - S41
  • [34] Difficult and failed intubation in obstetric anaesthesia: an observational study of airway management and complications associated with general anaesthesia for caesarean section
    McDonnell, N. J.
    Paech, M. J.
    Clavisi, O. M.
    Scott, K. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2008, 17 (04) : 292 - 297
  • [35] Racial and ethnic disparity in obstetric anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Craig, Robert
    El Nour, Shaima
    Xuereb, Lauren Borg
    Gibbs, Alexander
    Suriyakumar, Sureka
    Blake, Lindsay
    David, Anna L.
    Lee, Allison
    Nzelu, Diane
    Moonesinghe, S. Ramani
    Bampoe, Sohail
    Carvalho, Brendan
    Kua, Justin
    O'Carroll, James E.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2025,
  • [36] Improved patient safety with a simplified operating room to pediatric intensive care unit handover tool (PATHQS)
    Subramonian, D.
    Krahn, G.
    Wlodarczak, J.
    Lamb, L.
    Malherbe, S.
    Skarsgard, E.
    Patel, M.
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2024, 12
  • [37] The impact of the Safer Anaesthesia from Education (SAFE) Obstetric Anaesthesia training course in Ethiopia: A mixed methods longitudinal cohort study
    Moore, Jolene N.
    Morriss, Wayne W.
    Asfaw, Gebrehiwot
    Tesfaye, Gosa
    Ahmed, Aaliya R.
    Walker, Isabeau A.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2020, 48 (04) : 297 - 305
  • [38] National audit of anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery
    Rigg, JR
    Collins, K
    Jamrozik, K
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1997, 25 (03) : 282 - 285
  • [39] Anaesthesia for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy
    Upadya, Madhusudan
    Saneesh, P. J.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 60 (04) : 234 - 241
  • [40] S1 Guideline: Obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia
    Bremerich, D.
    Annecke, T.
    Chappell, D.
    Hanss, R.
    Kaufner, L.
    Kehl, F.
    Kranke, P.
    Girard, T.
    Gogarten, W.
    Greve, S.
    Neuhaus, S.
    Schlembach, D.
    Schlosser, L.
    Standl, T.
    Treskatsch, S.
    Volk, T.
    Wallenborn, J.
    Weber, S.
    Wenk, M.
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE & INTENSIVMEDIZIN, 2020, 61 : S300 - S338