An audit of the efficacy of a structured handover tool in obstetric anaesthesia

被引:6
|
作者
Dharmadasa, A. [1 ]
Bailes, I. [1 ]
Gough, K. [1 ]
Ebrahimi, N. [1 ]
Robinson, P. N. [1 ]
Lucas, D. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwick Pk Hosp & Clin Res Ctr, Dept Anaesthet, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
关键词
SAFE; Handover; Tool; Obstetric; Anaesthesia; Safety;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.12.002
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Introduction: The SAFE handover tool was developed to reduce critical omissions during handovers in obstetric anaesthesia. It comprises a simple proforma onto which the outgoing team documents patients who fall into one of four anaesthetically relevant categories: Sick patients; At-risk patients (of emergency caesarean section, major haemorrhage or anaesthetic problems); Followups; and Epidurals. We hypothesised that its use would reduce the number of critical omissions at handover. Methods: The efficacy of the SAFE handover tool was assessed through several audit cycles in a single maternity unit. The four SAFE categories were considered the gold standard, since they encompassed the consensus opinion of senior obstetric anaesthetists with respect to parturients they most wanted to know about at handover. Against these criteria it was possible to compare the number of cases that should have been handed-over against the number that were actually handed-over. Results: After implementation of the handover tool, patients were four times more likely to be handed-over than without the use of the tool: an increase from 49% to 79% of relevant cases (P < 0.0001, OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.19-7.6). The handover tool was particularly effective at increasing the handover rates of Sick and At-risk parturients, which increased from 21% to 67%(P < 0.0001, OR 7.7, 95% CI 2.7-21.7) and 25% to 78% (P < 0.01, OR 9.9, 95% CI 1.6-61.6), respectively. Conclusion: The SAFE handover tool significantly increased handover rates of anaesthetically relevant parturients. It is easy to remember and consistent with UK National Health Service Litigation Authority's guidance on risk management in maternity units. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A survey of Australasian obstetric anaesthesia audit
    Smith, SJ
    Cyna, AM
    Simmons, SW
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1999, 27 (04) : 391 - 395
  • [2] Obstetric audit and its implications for obstetric anaesthesia
    Paech, Michael
    Sinha, Aneeta
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 24 (03) : 413 - 425
  • [3] Structured Handover in General Surgery: An Audit of Current Practice
    Jones, Huw Geraint
    Watt, Bethany
    Lewis, Lauren
    Chaku, Shiban
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2019, 15 (01) : 7 - 10
  • [4] ISBAR as a Structured Tool for Patient Handover During Postoperative Recovery
    Kaltoft, Agnete
    Jacobsen, Yth Inga
    Tangsgaard, Mariann
    Jensen, Hanne Irene
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2022, 37 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [5] Measuring quality in obstetric anaesthesia
    Bamber, J. H.
    Sultan, P.
    BJA EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (08) : 296 - 303
  • [6] Anaesthesia for the obstetric patient with (non-obstetric) systemic disease
    Reide, Peter J. W.
    Yentis, Steve M.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 24 (03) : 313 - 326
  • [7] Neurological complications in obstetric regional anaesthesia
    Zin, Nico
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (08) : 431 - 436
  • [8] Neurological complications in obstetric regional anaesthesia
    Chambers, David J.
    Howells, Allison Cl
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (08) : 372 - 374
  • [9] Obstetric anaesthesia for instrumental vaginal delivery
    Diemunsch, P.
    Mercier, F. -J.
    Noll, E.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2008, 37 (08): : S269 - S275
  • [10] Neurological complications in obstetric regional anaesthesia
    Howells, Allison C. L.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (08) : 331 - 332