Continuous and interrupted abdominal-wall closure after primary emergency midline laparotomy (CONIAC-trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled single centre trial

被引:1
作者
Wolf, Sebastian [1 ]
de Gracia, Luis Arbona [1 ]
Sommer, Florian [1 ]
Schrempf, Matthias Christian [1 ]
Anthuber, Matthias [1 ]
Vlasenko, Dmytro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Augsburg, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplant Surg, Augsburg, Germany
关键词
SURGERY; ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE; WOUND MANAGEMENT; Adult surgery; WOUND DEHISCENCE; RETENTION SUTURES; INCISIONAL HERNIA; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; MULTICENTER; METAANALYSIS; STITCH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059709
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe optimal closure of the abdominal wall after emergency midline laparotomy is still a matter of debate due to lack of evidence. Although closure of the fascia using a continuous, all-layer suture technique with slowly absorbable monofilament material is common, complications like burst abdomen and hernia are frequent. Methods and analysisThis randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation evaluates the efficacy and safety of a continuous suture with or without additional interrupted retention sutures for closure of the abdominal fascia. Patients with an indication for a primary emergency midline laparotomy are eligible to participate in this study and will be randomised intraoperatively via block randomisation. Fascia closure in the intervention group will be done with a standard continuous suture with slowly absorbable monofilament material (MonoMax 1, B. Braun, Tuttlingen, Germany) and additional interrupted retention sutures every 2cm of the fascia using rapidly absorbable braided material (Vicryl 2, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). In the control group, the fascia is closed only with the standard continuous suture with slowly absorbable monofilament material. Sample size calculations (n=111 per study arm) are based on the available literature. The primary endpoint is the rate of dehiscence of the abdominal fascia (rate of burst abdomen within 30 days or rate of incisional hernia within 12 months). Secondary endpoints are wound infections, quality of life, length of hospital stay, morbidity and mortality. Patients as well as individuals involved in data collection, endpoint assessment, data analysis and quality of life assessment will be blinded. Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol, the patient information and the informed consent form have been approved by the ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (reference number: 20-1041). Study findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration numberDRKS00024802. WHO universal trial numberU1111-1259-1956
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of MonoMaxA® suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy-a controlled prospective multicentre trial: ISSAAC [NCT005725079] [J].
Albertsmeier, Markus ;
Seiler, Christoph M. ;
Fischer, Lars ;
Baumann, Petra ;
Huesing, Johannes ;
Seidlmayer, Christoph ;
Franck, Annette ;
Jauch, Karl-Walter ;
Knaebel, Hanns-Peter ;
Buechler, Markus W. .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 397 (03) :363-371
[2]   Validity and feasibility of the wound-QoL questionnaire on health-related quality of life in chronic wounds [J].
Augustin, Matthias ;
Montero, Elena Conde ;
Zander, Nicole ;
Baade, Katrin ;
Herberger, Katharina ;
Debus, E. Sebastian ;
Diener, Holger ;
Neubert, Thomas ;
Blome, Christine .
WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2017, 25 (05) :852-857
[3]   A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR CLOSING ABDOMINAL INCISIONS IN PATIENTS WITH POOR WOUND-HEALING [J].
BOISSEL, P ;
JAMART, J ;
GRUMILLIER, P ;
GROSDIDIER, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 143 (03) :380-381
[4]   THE SHORT-FORM-36 (SF-36) HEALTH SURVEY AND ITS USE IN PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION [J].
BRAZIER, J .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1995, 7 (05) :403-415
[5]   Acute wound failure [J].
Carlson, MA .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 77 (03) :607-+
[6]   Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Deerenberg, Eva B. ;
Harlaar, Joris J. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Lont, Harold E. ;
van Doorn, Helena C. ;
Heisterkamp, Joos ;
Wijnhoven, Bas P. L. ;
Schouten, Willem R. ;
Cense, Huib A. ;
Stockmann, Hein B. A. C. ;
Berends, Frits J. ;
Dijkhuizen, F. Paul H. L. J. ;
Dwarkasing, Roy S. ;
Jairam, An P. ;
van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H. ;
Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan ;
Jeekel, Johannes ;
Lange, Johan F. .
LANCET, 2015, 386 (10000) :1254-1260
[7]   Elective Midline Laparotomy Closure The INLINE Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Diener, Markus K. ;
Voss, Sabine ;
Jensen, Katrin ;
Buechler, Markus W. ;
Seiler, Christoph M. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 251 (05) :843-856
[8]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[9]  
GISLASON H, 1995, EUR J SURG, V161, P349
[10]  
Golling M, 2016, CHIRURG, V87, P744, DOI 10.1007/s00104-016-0254-6